Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 161 to 172 of 172

Thread: NEW SOCIONICS TEST BASED ON INFORMATIONAL ASPECTS

  1. #161
    Typometrics toska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    EII-I-HD 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    259
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Consistent with my typing of EII-Ne. Props to whoever made this.

    EII-2Ne
    | Harmonic > Dominant | INFJ | The Researcher | 4w5-1w9-5w4 | sp/sx
    "Everything comes and goes, pleasure moves on too early and trouble leaves too slow."

  2. #162
    Dark Rainbow bouncingoffclouds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Psychedelic Dream Castle in Outer Space
    TIM
    IEE-Fi-H, E4 sx/so
    Posts
    891
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I scored highest on IEI and I'm going to have an identity crisis
    Last edited by bouncingoffclouds; 11-30-2019 at 05:39 PM.
    "I am my own muse. I am the subject I know best, the subject I want to know better."
    4 core, sx/so slight sx bend, xNFp Melancholic, Negotiator, Explorer




  3. #163
    Psychic/Ghost Type
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    134
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fi 70%
    Ni 65%
    Ti 55%
    Fe 53%
    Ne 53%
    Te 48%
    Si 38%
    Se 30%

    The problem with this test is that it equates low usage of an information element to you not valuing that information element.

  4. #164
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    1,457
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bouncingoffclouds View Post
    I scored highest on IEI and I'm going to have an identity crisis
    If you only trust what other people say, you are going to be confused a lot because people often have unstated fundamentally different notions of how the theory works and what its scope is.

  5. #165
    Dark Rainbow bouncingoffclouds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Psychedelic Dream Castle in Outer Space
    TIM
    IEE-Fi-H, E4 sx/so
    Posts
    891
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, I agree and I've battled people hard on my quest. It always comes down to IEE or IEI for me though with descriptions, functions/blocks, everything...but it seems pretty clear to me now that I am IEE over IEI and delta over beta, so someone just slap me and tell me to shut up.
    "I am my own muse. I am the subject I know best, the subject I want to know better."
    4 core, sx/so slight sx bend, xNFp Melancholic, Negotiator, Explorer




  6. #166
    Cosmic Teapot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    SLI-H sp/so
    Posts
    1,229
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bouncingoffclouds View Post
    Yes, I agree and I've battled people hard on my quest. It always comes down to IEE or IEI for me though with descriptions, functions/blocks, everything...but it seems pretty clear to me now that I am IEE over IEI and delta over beta, so someone just slap me and tell me to shut up.
    Maybe it helps if you take a break from socionics for a while and let your mind settle.

  7. #167

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1037 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    the test is named "TSA-90" by Yuriy Zorin
    links: 1 , 2

    Quote Originally Posted by toska View Post
    Consistent with my typing of EII-Ne.
    no. as shows the close possibility for T type

    Quote Originally Posted by bouncingoffclouds View Post
    It always comes down to IEE or IEI for me
    no. as it came to SEI from me

    Quote Originally Posted by ouronis View Post
    because people often have unstated fundamentally different notions
    no. mainly it's practical problem. because the interpretation of related to types is not single-valued - it has a possibility nature. and the used data is often not quality and limited - what is common when you type someone who you do not know good IRL.
    also to interpret such data correctly needs skills, what most have rather low much due to small typing experience

    the usage of doubtful theories and their interpretations is secondary factor. you may use the same basic theory and most possibly will get low typing matches anyway. so muddy are methods of today and such bad are skills in typing of the very majority

    for example, noobs which ask about own types or identified them some monthes ago - objectively have bad typology understanding. which do not develop typing skills for long are also on a doubtful noobs level
    Last edited by Sol; 12-01-2019 at 12:53 PM.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  8. #168
    a two horned unicorn renegade Heretic 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sol's emo club
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    4,844
    Mentioned
    209 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thing is I have considered ILI, then I have met actual ones and then I'm like the worst comicbook guy ever.
    Measuring you right now

  9. #169
    voider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    TIM
    SEE-Se-N
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got SLE>SEE>ILE>IEE on this. Lol. Superego development happening here ig. Sol gonna waltz in saying I told you so, but I'm no SLE. It's just that typing by words is not nuanced...

  10. #170

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1037 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by voider View Post
    I'm no SLE.
    you are doubtful to have Fi. senselessly rude for them
    SLE was most possible by that photos. for nonverbal is better to have a video to be sure
    noobs easily change opinions and may understand own correct types later

    I got LSE (as main assumption) independently(!) from seems 3 typology enthusiasts (not random forum dudes alike you mostly are here) and was not sure in it for ~1 year until has gathered data about the theory (books), typed people near me and checked IR with them. only then I've accepted LSE as my type and Socionics
    if you'll do the similar - only then there will be good basis to be sure in your opinion about own type, it will be stable. you have no this at now to be seriously sure in your type

    there is also my IR test to help you
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  11. #171
    voider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    TIM
    SEE-Se-N
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Sol Se-Fi is vastly different than Ne-Fi. And Fi is subjective and highly personal. They won't be nice to someone they don't like. And I REALLY don't like you.

    +you don't know anything about me, who I've been typed by and how many people have done that. You are also senselessly rude btw. So you must not value Fi as well...

  12. #172
    Dark Rainbow bouncingoffclouds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Psychedelic Dream Castle in Outer Space
    TIM
    IEE-Fi-H, E4 sx/so
    Posts
    891
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    to say SEE or IEE is incapable of being "rude" or aggressive is stupid as hell and once again my excerpts from Gulenko on this were ignored
    "I am my own muse. I am the subject I know best, the subject I want to know better."
    4 core, sx/so slight sx bend, xNFp Melancholic, Negotiator, Explorer




Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •