NEW SOCIONICS TEST BASED ON INFORMATIONAL ASPECTS

[jason_m]

LII-Ne (Or LII-IEI)

0
0
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
3
3
1
4
4
1
1
0
4
4
4
0
4
4
4
4
4
1
3
4
2
2
4
3
3
4
4
3
1
3
0
0
1
3
0
0
4
3
2
1
0
2
1
2
4
4
0
1
2
3
3
1
3
3
4
2
1
4
4
4
2
1
1
3
0
1
2
2
1
4
0
4
4
2
4
1
1
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
3
4
1
2

[jason_m]

Socionics Test.png



IEI 23.06%

[Chae]

@Adam Strange you have good predictive powers.



I found the method weird but why not.

[LuckyOne]

Alrighty, I'd have no idea what to do with the answers.

Username:LuckyOne
Currently self typed as:SLE

4
3
1
1
1
4
1
4
4
4
1
3
1
3
3
3
4
3
3
0
3
4
0
1
1
4
3
1
3
1
4
3
3
1
1
1
1
4
0
3
4
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
4
4
1
3
4
4
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
4
3
1
3
3
0
0
3
1
3
3
0
3
0
3
3
1
1
0
1
1
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
1
0
4

[The Reality Denialist]

Alrighty, I'd have no idea what to do with the answers.

Username:LuckyOne
Currently self typed as:SLE

Your results
Spectacle.S28478.png

[maniac]

Attachment 9924

[Shining]

socionics.png

[wasp]

this time i got my friend to take the test for me

[hag]

[Kalinoche buenanoche]

i think I have taken the adjectives-based test before. this time I had a hard time using 1's so it's mostly 2s and a bunch of 3s. my only 1 was for ''businesslike''

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
4
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
2

Type %
ILE 6.62%
SEI 11.16%
ESE 3.79%
LII 7.53%
EIE 4.29%
LSI 5.04%
SLE 5.09%
IEI 12.09%
SEE 4.43%
ILI 8.49%
LIE 3.40%
ESI 4.60%
LSE 3.00%
EII 6.88%
IEE 5.76%
SLI 7.83%


I get IEI and SEI first but the IA percentages are like this

Si Te Fi Se Ni Fe Ti Ne I J E P
60% 48% 53% 50% 65% 60% 58% 65% 63% 40% 38% 60%

[The Reality Denialist]

Top scores: ILE and IEE were about the even.
Lowest ESI and LSI also about the same... You can actually deduce it from top scores...

So apparently I need grounding.



Spectacle.Z28478.png

Been planning on dipping toes on web programming on Python maybe someday I do something about this situation.
Test works fine under LibreOffice (It's free and easy to use!)
https://www.libreoffice.org

[thegreenfaerie]

I scored highest on IEI and I'm going to have an identity crisis

[ouronis]

I scored highest on IEI and I'm going to have an identity crisis

If you only trust what other people say, you are going to be confused a lot because people often have unstated fundamentally different notions of how the theory works and what its scope is.

[thegreenfaerie]

Yes, I agree and I've battled people hard on my quest. It always comes down to IEE or IEI for me though with descriptions, functions/blocks, everything...but it seems pretty clear to me now that I am IEE over IEI and delta over beta, so someone just slap me and tell me to shut up.

[Cosmic Teapot]

Yes, I agree and I've battled people hard on my quest. It always comes down to IEE or IEI for me though with descriptions, functions/blocks, everything...but it seems pretty clear to me now that I am IEE over IEI and delta over beta, so someone just slap me and tell me to shut up.

Maybe it helps if you take a break from socionics for a while and let your mind settle.

[Nunki]

Fi 70%
Ni 65%
Ti 55%
Fe 53%
Ne 53%
Te 48%
Si 38%
Se 30%

The problem with this test is that it equates low usage of an information element to you not valuing that information element.

[The Reality Denialist]

Thing is I have considered ILI, then I have met actual ones and then I'm like the worst comicbook guy ever.

[FreelancePoliceman]

Thing is I have considered ILI, then I have met actual ones and then I'm like the worst comicbook guy ever.

Read A Confederacy of Dunces to see a parody of an ILI.

[voider]

I got SLE>SEE>ILE>IEE on this. Lol. Superego development happening here ig. Sol gonna waltz in saying I told you so, but I'm no SLE. It's just that typing by words is not nuanced...

[Sol]

I'm no SLE.

you are doubtful to have Fi. senselessly rude for them
SLE was most possible by that photos. for nonverbal is better to have a video to be sure
noobs easily change opinions and may understand own correct types later

I got LSE (as main assumption) independently(!) from seems 3 typology enthusiasts (not random forum dudes alike you mostly are here) and was not sure in it for ~1 year until has gathered data about the theory (books), typed people near me and checked IR with them. only then I've accepted LSE as my type and Socionics
if you'll do the similar - only then there will be good basis to be sure in your opinion about own type, it will be stable. you have no this at now to be seriously sure in your type

there is also my IR test to help you

[voider]

@Sol Se-Fi is vastly different than Ne-Fi. And Fi is subjective and highly personal. They won't be nice to someone they don't like. And I REALLY don't like you.

+you don't know anything about me, who I've been typed by and how many people have done that. You are also senselessly rude btw. So you must not value Fi as well...

[thegreenfaerie]

to say SEE or IEE is incapable of being "rude" or aggressive is stupid as hell and once again my excerpts from Gulenko on this were ignored

[BrainlessSquid]

Username: Megatrop
Currently typed as: EII

0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
3
2
3
3
2
0
4
1
0
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
3
0
1
3
0
0
3
1
3
2
0
2
2
1
3
3
3
1
1
0
3
2
3
3
4
1
0
1
2
4
4
2
3
3
0
4
2
1
2
3
4
3
1
4
3
4
1
1
2
1
3
2
0
1
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
1
1
2
3
3
4

[BrainlessSquid]

I got IEE > EII > ILE > LII. I'm usually calm so I (and people) assume I'm introverted, but I was reading that the more Ne is expressed, the calmer and torn from reality the individual gets, so that is a good candidate for an explanation. Also my Se is pretty weak, so it supports the idea that my Ne is used much more than my role Se.

[Sah Kel Plaisir]

Got ILI > IEI and SLI > SEI .
By dichotomies I'm an obvious INTP but I use IEs more balancedly

[Limidae]

ETA: You can calculate your own results, here is the English spreadsheet to take the test: (download)

Original Russian spreadsheet: (download)

------------------

It's a translation so if there is a misunderstanding, let me know.

Evaluate each "aspect" (adjective) as follows:

4 - absolutely me

3 - looks like it's me

2 - don't know (avoid this if possible)

1 - mostly not

0 - no way 1. Aggressive 2. Explosive 3. Presence of inner anger 4. Evil 5. Cruel 6. Irritable 7. Controlling 8. Demanding 9. Straightforward 10. Interested in profit 11. Neat 12. Thrifty 13. Home oriented 14. Jealous 15. Caring 16. Lazy 17. Unyielding 18. Careful with money 19. Cleanly 20.Misanthrope 21. Inventive 22. Intelligent 23. Inquisitive 24. Simple 25. Forgetful 26. Madcap 27. Cunning 28. Eccentric 29. Erudite 30. Caustic 31. Fearful 32. Visionary 33. Dreamy 34. Cautious 35. Provident 36. Easy to scare 37. Romantic 38. Superstitious 39. Worrying 40. Yielding 41. Businessy 42. Constructive 43. Unflappable 44. Obstinate 45. Objective 46. ​​Pragmatic 47. Enterprising 48. Prudent 49. Focused 50. Persistent 51. Impassive 52. Tough 53. Pedantic 54. Well-balanced 55. Serious 56. Composed 57. Fair 58. Smart 59. Formalist 60. Cold-blooded 61. Artistic 62. Enthusiastic 63. Friendly 64. Compassionate 65. Moody 66. Nervous 67. Forthcoming 68. Spunky 69. Sentimental 70. Passionate 71. Delicate 72. Moralistic 73. Peace minded 74. Kind-hearted 75. Easily appeased 76. Compliant 77. Conscientious 78. Empathising 79. Helpful 80. Meticulous 81. Plodding 82. Silent 83. Slow 84. Alert 85. Inactive 86. Unsocial 87. Withdrawn 88. Patient 89. Listening 90. Passive 91. Disorderly 92. Flighty 93. Flexible 94. Volatile 95. Impulsive 96. Unorganized 97. Spontanous 98. Fickle 99. Malleable 100. Free

uncivilized SLI (ILI)
Subteigh EII (EII)
kalinoche IEI (ESI?)
Person EII (EII)
Martitsa EII (EII)
Nymeria LSE (EII)

1
1
3
1
4
1
1
3
3
0
0
1
2
4
3
4
4
1
0
4
1
4
4
3
4
3
1
1
1
4
3
2
3
3
4
1
0
3
4
1
0
0
0
4
1
4
1
4
3
4
1
4
4
3
1
3
3
3
1
1
3
1
3
1
4
1
0
4
0
1
1
1
3
4
1
3
0
4
3
1
2
3
4
1
4
3
4
1
1
4
4
4
0
3
1
3
1
4
0
3

[Socionics Is A Cult]

1
1
3
1
4
1
1
3
3
0
0
1
2
4
3
4
4
1
0
4
1
4
4
3
4
3
1
1
1
4
3
2
3
3
4
1
0
3
4
1
0
0
0
4
1
4
1
4
3
4
1
4
4
3
1
3
3
3
1
1
3
1
3
1
4
1
0
4
0
1
1
1
3
4
1
3
0
4
3
1
2
3
4
1
4
3
4
1
1
4
4
4
0
3
1
3
1
4
0
3

[Limidae]

thanks!! i figured out the sheet later after that xD @Subteigh

[Spiteful Sisyphus]

EDIT: Someone that knows vbulletin stuff better than me. How can I get a picture to display without being a link, and still control its size in the render? I use a 4k monitor so screenshots uploaded get blown up stupid-large like this

[Ave]

EDIT: Someone that knows vbulletin stuff better than me. How can I get a picture to display without being a link, and still control its size in the render? I use a 4k monitor so screenshots uploaded get blown up stupid-large like this

The only way I know is to download the image onto your hard drive, resize it via your operating system's resizing tool (I'm on windows 10), then upload it to an image hosting site like imgur. With imgur images resized to about 0.1 to 0.5 mp usually give a decent size on here. (On imgur, copy and paste the code under "BBcode" into the post).

If there are other ways to do this, I don't know of any, personally.

[Spiteful Sisyphus]

The only way I know is to download the image onto your hard drive, resize it via your operating system's resizing tool (I'm on windows 10), then upload it to an image hosting site like imgur. With imgur images resized to about 0.1 to 0.5 mp usually give a decent size on here. (On imgur, copy and paste the code under "BBcode" into the post).

If there are other ways to do this, I don't know of any, personally.

Bleh I've been uploading to github. Only difference is the resizing tool. Oh well. Everyone can enjoy my obnoxious 4k posts

[theum nathair]

ETA: You can calculate your own results, here is the English spreadsheet to take the test: (download)

Original Russian spreadsheet: (download)

------------------

It's a translation so if there is a misunderstanding, let me know.

Evaluate each "aspect" (adjective) as follows:

4 - absolutely me

3 - looks like it's me

2 - don't know (avoid this if possible)

1 - mostly not

0 - no way 1. Aggressive 2. Explosive 3. Presence of inner anger 4. Evil 5. Cruel 6. Irritable 7. Controlling 8. Demanding 9. Straightforward 10. Interested in profit 11. Neat 12. Thrifty 13. Home oriented 14. Jealous 15. Caring 16. Lazy 17. Unyielding 18. Careful with money 19. Cleanly 20.Misanthrope 21. Inventive 22. Intelligent 23. Inquisitive 24. Simple 25. Forgetful 26. Madcap 27. Cunning 28. Eccentric 29. Erudite 30. Caustic 31. Fearful 32. Visionary 33. Dreamy 34. Cautious 35. Provident 36. Easy to scare 37. Romantic 38. Superstitious 39. Worrying 40. Yielding 41. Businessy 42. Constructive 43. Unflappable 44. Obstinate 45. Objective 46. ​​Pragmatic 47. Enterprising 48. Prudent 49. Focused 50. Persistent 51. Impassive 52. Tough 53. Pedantic 54. Well-balanced 55. Serious 56. Composed 57. Fair 58. Smart 59. Formalist 60. Cold-blooded 61. Artistic 62. Enthusiastic 63. Friendly 64. Compassionate 65. Moody 66. Nervous 67. Forthcoming 68. Spunky 69. Sentimental 70. Passionate 71. Delicate 72. Moralistic 73. Peace minded 74. Kind-hearted 75. Easily appeased 76. Compliant 77. Conscientious 78. Empathising 79. Helpful 80. Meticulous 81. Plodding 82. Silent 83. Slow 84. Alert 85. Inactive 86. Unsocial 87. Withdrawn 88. Patient 89. Listening 90. Passive 91. Disorderly 92. Flighty 93. Flexible 94. Volatile 95. Impulsive 96. Unorganized 97. Spontanous 98. Fickle 99. Malleable 100. Free

uncivilized SLI (ILI)
Subteigh EII (EII)
kalinoche IEI (ESI?)
Person EII (EII)
Martitsa EII (EII)
Nymeria LSE (EII)

4 - absolutely me

3 - looks like it's me

2 - don't know (avoid this if possible)

1 - mostly not

0 - no way 1 1 4 1 1 3 0 2 3 3 1 3 1 2 1 4 3 1 2 4 1 4 2 0 4 1 3 3 4 3 1 3 1 4 3 1 0 3 2 3 2 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 1 2 0 1 3 3 2 3 4 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 2 3 4 1 4 3 0 3 3 4 1 1 3 1 2 2 2

Can't download on this device, but hopefully will remember to do this later. If someone wants to put this through the algorithm for me, I'll give a constructive vote

[Persephone]

me? i redid mine with numbers

I can't copy paste it. You still have to review the format

[Persephone]

Surprised I got EII



My attempt to be as accurate as subjectively possible.

As any test, it's not 100% accurate either. But it's fun so let's have fun

[Persephone]

@Nymeria it's unclear, please put less 2s. Also share your self-typing.

[Moonbeaux Rainfox]

Nymeria it's unclear, please put less 2s. Also share your self-typing.

Done and Done.

[Persephone]

Done and Done.

Still not clear. You are 50/50 on the intro/extro scale.

[Moonbeaux Rainfox]

Still not clear. You are 50/50 on the intro/extro scale.

Nevermind. Can you still post the graph if it's unclear? I take what I get.

[Persephone]

Nevermind. Can you still post the graph if it's unclear? I take what I get.

@Nymeria
That's quite a surprise
nym.jpg

[Sol]

the test is named "TSA-90" by Yuriy Zorin
links: 1 , 2

Consistent with my typing of EII-Ne.

no. as shows the close possibility for T type

It always comes down to IEE or IEI for me

no. as it came to SEI from me

because people often have unstated fundamentally different notions

no. mainly it's practical problem. because the interpretation of related to types is not single-valued - it has a possibility nature. and the used data is often not quality and limited - what is common when you type someone who you do not know good IRL.
also to interpret such data correctly needs skills, what most have rather low much due to small typing experience

the usage of doubtful theories and their interpretations is secondary factor. you may use the same basic theory and most possibly will get low typing matches anyway. so muddy are methods of today and such bad are skills in typing of the very majority

for example, noobs which ask about own types or identified them some monthes ago - objectively have bad typology understanding. which do not develop typing skills for long are also on a doubtful noobs level