Username: Roro
Currently self-type as: N/A
0
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
4
3
1
3
1
1
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
0
1
0
2
2
3
1
3
3
4
3
2
4
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
1
3
3
1
3
2
1
3
2
3
4
3
3
0
1
0
2
3
1
1
3
0
4
0
2
4
4
3
3
1
4
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
1
2
1
0
0
3
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
Username: Roro
Currently self-type as: N/A
0
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
4
3
1
3
1
1
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
0
1
0
2
2
3
1
3
3
4
3
2
4
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
1
3
3
1
3
2
1
3
2
3
4
3
3
0
1
0
2
3
1
1
3
0
4
0
2
4
4
3
3
1
4
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
1
2
1
0
0
3
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
Too mean to be IEI, not responsible enough to be EII.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
I tried to do this twice. Both times got distracted and lost my place. I have to do it when more focused. I wish there was a fill in form version.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Username: Simo
Currently self-type as: ILI
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
3
3
1
3
4
3
1
4
1
1
1
0
1
4
3
1
3
0
3
2
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
2
0
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
2
3
1
0
1
1
1
1
3
1
0
1
0
3
2
3
1
2
3
1
3
1
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
2
0
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
Would you mind giving a download link to the spreadsheet?
Chips and Underwear
Currently self-type as: LII/EII
0
1
3
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
1
4
3
1
4
4
4
1
3
2
1
3
3
0
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
0
4
3
1
3
1
3
3
1
1
4
3
3
0
1
3
3
3
3
4
4
2
0
1
3
3
4
3
3
3
1
3
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
2
1
3
3
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
*ahem*
mad·cap
ˈmadˌkap/
adjective
adjective: madcap; adjective: mad-cap
1.
amusingly eccentric.
"a surreal, madcap novel"
synonyms: zany, eccentric, unconventional
"a madcap comedy"
done or thought up without considering the consequences; crazy or reckless.
"some madcap money-making scheme"
synonyms: reckless, rash, foolhardy, foolish, harebrained, wild, hasty, imprudent, ill-advised; More
informalcrazy, crackpot, crack-brained
"a madcap scheme"
noun
noun: madcap; plural noun: madcaps; noun: mad-cap; plural noun: mad-caps
1.
an eccentric person.
synonyms: eccentric, crank, madman/madwoman, maniac, lunatic; oddity, character;
informalcrackpot, oddball, weirdo, loony, nut, fruit loop, screwball, loon
"she was a boisterous madcap"
Last edited by Galen; 10-13-2015 at 04:20 AM. Reason: format
@Galen only reads first post ---> strong p
lol, there's no reason to make people wait - it's not like you created this test
here's an English version of the spreadsheet, for anyone interested (uploaded on Dropbox). the translation of some terms are slightly different from Kore's OP. the spreadsheet gives you detailed results for each sociotype, as well as the other graphs. if you already filled this out, you'll just need to copy and paste your answers.
Last edited by glam; 10-12-2015 at 07:57 PM.
okay, but i don't really understand why withholding the original spreadsheet is necessary for you to obtain and analyze the statistics - all you have to do is explain this and ask people for the data. pretty sure most people here would be happy to post their answers for this reason.
wow, I filled it in, edited the 2s and got:
ESE 11,64%
ESI 11,7%
GO TO HELL!
i've been slowly altering my results to create something more perfect, with this new translation
Si - 55%
Te - 55%
Fi - 60%
Se - 43%
Ni - 55%
Fe - 70%
Ti - 60%
Ne - 73%
ILE 5.31%
SEI 11.48%
ESE 3.64%
LII 10.89%
EIE 3.64%
LSI 4.82%
SLE 3.11%
IEI 11.48%
SEE 3.11%
ILI 7.89%
LIE 2.86%
ESI 4.82%
LSE 2.86%
EII 10.89%
IEE 5.31%
SLI 7.89%
After filling it out with these values(and editting the 2s ofc), I got:
Fi 63%
Fe 63%
Si 58%
Se 48%
Ti 45%
Te 30%
Ni 30%
Ne 25%
I 38%
J 58%
E 63%
P 43%
ESE 18,18%
ESI 9,61%
SEE 9,35%
LSE 8,73%
SEI 8,06%
EIE 7,06%
LSI 6,92%
SLE 5,68%
IEE 4,92%
IEI 4,21%
EII 3,89%
LIE 3,39%
ILE 2,99%
LII 2,8%
SLI 2,75%
ILI 1,44%
...ok!
I tried again last night and gave up. I am a little sick today though and even less focused. I did the spreadsheet. It was easy but I did it quickly and used more twos than I probably should. I will do it again when I feel better.
Edit: Update, no longer sick, clear-headed. I made some choices on some of those twos but still balance on j/p but I am also pretty close in MBTI too.
Last edited by Aylen; 10-14-2015 at 08:42 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung