I don't see my frustration with him as being a diversion. It was a frustrated reaction to his actions. His taunt at the end of the first post.
His verbalization engages the reader individually and has really zero relevance to the topic. The first diversion was his alone. It's the childish(What I think) "nyah nyah nyah" playground taunt. The evidence of his diversion is clear. I don't even disagree with his argument since it's not "his" but rather an argument against MBTI, which isn't socionics. As far as usefulness and uselessness of socionics, I'll leave that to the individual.Originally Posted by Cpig
As far as his attempt to engage the forum at the "Your" level, I think I have the leeway to do this since he opened the door.
And this taunt was not a debate about socionics but about why people discuss it because it's "useless" or somehow interest in this theory has negative meaning for him.
So he was the first to go negative portrait as well.
Let's be quite clear about this.
Capitalist pig is the first to create a diversion, the first to engage in negativity(at a personal level) and he cannot escape criticism for that.
I consider his action a character flaw but others can have their own opinions about this, but this is over and done with and there are more interesting things to discuss.
If he would like to answer some questions. I welcome others to answer these questions as well and I will make some separate threads for this.
"Why is socionics meaningful to you?"
"How did you began your interest with socionics?"
"What did you get from socionics and/or socionics community?"



Reply With Quote