@TJay
You're right and it is a problem. I think it might be a better theory if they took the types out of it and instead created a theory that posits different ways of being with reality. Then the relationships and explanations become relative to what's going on with people and how they are thinking, perceiving, and feeling in a given context, along with other people.
Because honestly a lot of socionics has made a lot of sense in my life, whether scientific or not, if I throw away the idea of an absolute type and just perceive the interactions with myself and others. I guess it's why I keep coming back. But if I confine myself to its stereotypes and idea of having an absolute type, no it doesn't make much sense and is kind of silly in that regard, of course.
Okay, but Cpig hasn't shown any interest in the merits of socionics here, only criticism. He forces people to justify their time, behavior, and beliefs with socionics, while never acknowledging them as valid. He's forcing people to be defensive and deserves that reaction, at least.



Reply With Quote