Quote Originally Posted by wacey View Post
I don't think he is critizing typology itself, it seems like more-so he is being critical of people's beliefs in it to begin with. Sometimes people speak in the affirmative when they discuss typology, without paying homage to the truth that this could all be 'not-true' and so in doing so seem silly from a critical stand-point.
yeah but this is a forum to discuss said typology, is every single post supposed to come with a disclaimer "this may or may not be bullshit, don't forget!" would you expect religious people on a Christian forum to do this same (just an example)? honestly if anybody is on a forum just to tell ppl there that their beliefs are bullshit, i'd probably see that person as a troll.

i'm not saying socionics or typology can't be criticized or whatever, i know they've got their problems. i think most people are aware of them too, and they're often alluded to in various discussions.