That doesn't wash as an explanation. You are very singular and aggressive in the way you type others, the frequency at which you do it, the "confirmed and final" -ity of it. The extent to which you do it is unique to the forum, nevermind being peculiar for an EII-type.
The way you clutch at straws and have a piecemeal, inconsistent approach to typing others really does seem like poorto me (not even
-role). You confirm you prejudices with a highly subjective focus on VI (with "J-necks" and "P-necks" etc., that you have never convincingly explained). You revert to simplistic arguments to suit your own ends, such as now attempting to explain one aspect of your behaviour as being an exemplary example of one Reinin dichotomy (rather than focusing on the meat-and-bones IMs). "Typing others is part of me being a strategic type" does not explain what is more readily evident: your high levels of energy, your permanent state of restlessness, and your lack of inner harmony.
Further to this, I think those who don't have you on ignore generally give you an easy time considering your link to Rod Novichkov, which you never satisfactorily explained. You claimed to have been taught Socionics by him (including this VI technique I think), and cited him as an expert. He was shown to be a fraud who was only focused on making a quick buck (even getting his girlfriend to pose as a co-author in attempt to add to the apparent expertise. I noticed that his typing statistics (that he allegedly observed in the real world) were very similar to your own (in regards your typings of forum members) e.g. having an especially high numbers of sensing types.
This combined with your obvious charade at pretending (or at least overdoing the role) to be an EII, even on many occasions when simply being a natural human being would have been normal means that I don't consider the quest to finalise and confirm your Socionics type to been fruitful (especially if the quest must begin at EII, and behind a gun turret).



to me (not even
