Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
Rick DeLong

Rick DeLong is ESTj/LSE type; he is the founder of Wikisocion and another Socionics site. He once typed me incorrectly as INFp...not noticing that the J is morphologically apparent; here is his personal website. If you want to know what ESTj's value and are like, please read his site...

Personal Website of Rick DeLong

In an independent study of ESTj's, that I conducted, I asked 50 men between the ages of 20 and 35 what their favorite books were they said Guns, Germs, and Steel and The Power of Myth also they included the economy, statistics, environment to be a big issue and concern for them. I also asked other relevent questions and will eventually post the results on my blog.

Here's George Clooney loving the book and meeting the author..

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/08/03/ggs
Quote Originally Posted by somavision View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
VI DISCUSSION FOR RICK DELONG - WE WANT YOUR PICTURES

To VI you please post two pictures of you

One shoulder's up, face forward shot in clear resulution
Two shoulder's up, side view shot clearly exposing your spine and head, please don't wear a hat to cover up
The Royal "we"?
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
RICK DELONG WE WANT YOUR PICS

I have asked several times for your pictures and you continue not to provide them; are you self conscious?

POST YOUR PICTURES
POST YOUR PICTURES
POST YOUR PICTURES
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
I am not in a group, I am on a public forum..you arn't people, you're objects. Emotions of a partner, you're not my partner. As a compress, I have championed myself against information offered by Rick, where wrongly used has resulted in people mistyping themselves and dating people wrong for them...INFj's are very protective of the feelings of others
Quote Originally Posted by Diana
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
correct typing
Then why are you here? What do you hope to accomplish?
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
and, i no longer want to see human being cursed at for voicing their opinion or fact.
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
and, I want to see christopher reeve's type changed to ESTp
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Diana
Whose correct typing? Are you expecting everyone to agree with you and your methodology? How realistic is that?
I didn't say mine alone; I want people to tell me what methodology they are using, in a clear way, and it must be consistantly objectable in order for it to be correct right?...like

my method is square face = S type etc...that way people arn't being superficial about what VI is.
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Diana
Do you think your approach is getting you anywhere? Do you think demanding someone to change what they have listed as a type will actually work? If it does work, do you think it's because they actually agree with you, or because they got sick of being harrassed about it? Which would you rather have?
person A, is you,

A lists methodology in steps and concludes their typing
person B lists methodology and concludes typing
me, I list my methodology and conclude my typing...so far I am the only person who has listed methology for my typing but i seem to be the only person who has been hammered by a method that has been conclusive and consistant.
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
and, I want red velvet cake
Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Diana
I don't VI. I don't even type people that much. Some people type by element/function, others behaviorally, others relationally or how much they like/dislike someone, or how easy they find them to identify with. Different methods for different people, and lots of different opinions on type. Usually, if you'll ask a person how they came to a conclusion, they'll tell you. Demanding that they do almost never works. Conclusive and consistant aren't things I'd use to describe any socionics method I've ever seen. How sure are you that your conclusions even mean anything?

and I don't have any red velvet cake.
I conducted a test of 250 students; asked them to VI then asked them to take a test for each of their 16 types and they were very accurate...statistically phenomenal.
..