Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
OK, I'm not going to get down to every minute detail as they can be interpreted in too many ways without having the real context.

But here's my general observations.

You didn't bold most of the insecure parts in Te suggestive. The same for Ti role. Whatever you bolded in Fe ignoring seems more Fe PoLR than strong 3D Fe. The Si again is bolded in a way that it seems just weak devalued Si rather than the very strong 4D demonstrative Si of ESI.

As for the Fi base: when you bolded "ESIs are primarily attuned to the world of their own inner emotional states and emotional reactions to others." - "primarily" is the key word here. Is this what you are always and naturally focused on? You don't come off that way to me. You seem to focus on logic much more naturally than on emotions. It's quite telling that you did not bold the parts that would indicate 4D Fi and not just strongly valued gamma Fi.
Thanks for the analysis . I'm not primarily focused on my inner emotional state but I am very away when my emotional state is out of balance and it can stop me from functioning. I am quite naturally aware of the emotional reactions of others and their motives as well.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
OK. If that's all, it doesn't make you "extremely Fi+Se". What you quoted is simply quadra values, all gammas may relate to it.
If that's the case then fair enough.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
If you go back to your 80q you can see your answers for Ni/Te were definitely stronger than answers for Fi/Se though you weren't terrible at those either. It sounds like decently dualized ILI
So what does it actually mean to "dualize" someone? Is it to simply develop their dual-seeking function by interacting with them with your base function? If I am ILI-Te could I dualize an EII with my strong Te?

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Yes general gamma values. Same post also shows Ni ego.

Well people can overidentify with the HA, which for an ILI would be Fi.
Tbh, as soon as I read the Fi function descrption from MBTI I knew it was definately one of my four functions, or in socionics terms I knew I valued it, even more so than Te. It's the percieving pair which has always made me question my type. Sure, the socionics and MBTI descrptions of Ni are probably the most contrasting of all the functions, but they're still both based off of Jung's original work and I don't particurly identify with Ni from Psychological Types.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
I wasn't paying attention to Maritsa's posts but are you sure she described it as jumping in without thought?
She described it as "chasing someone down like a greyhound".

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
How was it a problem that it had to be decently priced?
I can be pretty loose with my money from time to time but on that day I particularly didn't want to have to go out to buy dissappointing, overpriced food.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Commenting on that chatbox stuff too.

You remind me of an ILI-Te friend who can get domineering in certain areas in her relationship Some stuff is important to her so she tries to have control there and she stays out of everything else. She's also quite into Fi, she loves analyzing a lot of Fi stuff in her blog but it's clear it's not in her Ego (because she has to analyse it with effort) and that she has suggestive Se.
Yeah, one of the only reasons I still entertain INTJ/ILI is because I'm fairly sure I'm a type 1w9 in enneagram and INTJ type 1s are said to have quite high Te and Fi and but not particurly good Ni despite it being the leading/base function. Your friend sounds like a type 1 to me.