Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
OK then that part doesn't fit you. Doesn't have to.
It adds to the list of victim traits that I don't relate to. Also, girls have tried to grab me by the arm/hand before and I don't recall a single time I didn't react by ripping my arm away.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Yeah, it seems a bit too specific. I do think gender plays a role.
I reckon gender plays a big role in the misconceptions but not in the actual romantic style. I've noticed the dominant victim/submissive aggressor description from the first link does actually seem about right when it comes to my ISFj friend and ESFp brother.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Te/Ne, why 4D, beyond having high test scores, just because that's not going to prove dimensionality. That's not how it's defined.
Because I relate to higher dimensions of Te/Ne but I don't relate to higher dimensions of Ni, in fact I relate to ESp 1D Ni as I pointed out before.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
The rest of the stuff is ambiguous data/loose correlations. E.g. SEI or ESI. Who knows. Childlike is a generic word as stated, etc.
Pretty sure he is SEI but sure, you can't know that for certain since you haven't interacted with him.

I'm actually pretty good at typing others, I'm just terrible at typing myself.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
It's not bad, I don't know how often the physical features part works out, it's logical to me tho' that it's not going to fit every LIE. The clothing part is often true for them as written but again, obviously not always. The humour part works out, the double entendres stuff is very typical of LIE I think. (Other types do it too but the way LIE does it seems different )

What's truly relevant from that description is this great summary on their style of thinking:

"They are very open to new proposals, however they always investigate the practicality of any theory. They quickly realise the potential of new ideas, and are often the first people to apply them practically. They are open to all novelties and always try to use them in their own activities."

ILI on the other hand is much more skeptical and will more likely turn down opportunities missing some that could've worked out to be real good as they see more easily the possible problems with the proposal without brainstorming beyond that negative prediction.

"ENTjs are very enthusiastic when starting new projects sometimes becoming so passionate that they can forget about everything else. They normally start small, gradually working their way up to bigger things. They can work very hard and extremely quickly, often working on many tasks simultaneously. ENTjs like to figure out and try many things. They are not the sort of people who blindly believe in phenomena that cannot be proved, for example UFOs, telekinesis and ESP. They are often very curious and dynamic people often experiencing a great variety of occupations during their lifetimes. They are always experimenting and sometimes get involved in projects that others started but couldn't finish."

This is also good to show the experimental V-S thinking* of LIEs. And yes, they are very much multitaskers. They are going to be a lot more skeptical than ILI about unprovable mystical stuff, yup.

*: See DarkAngelFireWolf69 cognitive styles for that
Yeah, you are saying I'm ILI even though most of the information you post implies LIE. Another poster actually said my Se seemed too strong for an ILI and it's starting to become evident. I think you may have missed this post but I explained my way of thinking (which matches the above) and actually mentioned my sensitivity to sentences that can be interpreted in more than one way.

Btw, the ILI description on that site doesn't sound like me but the ENTx ones do.