Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
The16types articles and wikisocion are alright but it seems like you are interpreting some stuff too literally as a beginner.
Or it's just written poorly (which it is) e.g. using terms like "Aggressor" and "Victim" and then going on to say "Oh, but we're not actually using these words in the way they were meant to be used" - then why not create your own terms or find existing ones that properly encapsulate your concept, genius? I mentioned before that I can't stand people who abuse Ti i.e. people who like to make theoretical books that ramble on and on for the sake of rambling and not getting anywhere or purposefully make a concept seem more complicated than it actually is just so they can feel more intelligent than they really are.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Yet you said before that you think you are good at foreseeing things.
Good but not natural.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Do you relate to Ti over Te?

What are your thoughts on Fe Mobilizing? See: http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Fe "Fe as activating function in ILE (ENTp; Don Quixote) and SLE (ESTp; Zhukov)"

You don't exactly come off as a Ti / Fe valuer to me, at all.
Doesn't really sound like me. Role sounds like how I was before while vulnerable is like how I am now. Suggestive also sounds a bit like me.