Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
OK, can you analyse the gamma quadra's Te in the same fashion?

Also, about balancing out your inner world - does not look like Te paired with Si.

  • Gamma types take a longer-term view regarding efficiency and profitability, giving lower priority to the short term. Likewise, they tend to aim at the broader benefits of decisions, rather than only at those affecting themselves, giving them an inclination for self-sacrifice.


This applies to me but my "longer term" view is not very long-term. As @Maritsa mentioned before, I tend to only look toward the near future rather than the far future. The latter part is just...generic and it would apply to anyone who isn't selfish.


  • Gamma types like to talk about where present trends are leading in terms of potentially profitable events and undertakings.


Yes, but in the opposite way; I tend to notice where they are going in terms of potentially unwanted events.


  • Gamma types tend to give more value to ideas and concepts that are firmly connected to factual information.


The only part I can totally agree with. I can entertain unsupported ideas but I won't value them as much as ones that have factual information to support them. I'll listen to people that want to drop by and say "ILI" (@Myst, your first post was exactly this) but will I believe them and be confident in a typing based on this? Nope. I may find fault with some of the logic @Maritsa uses when trying to find my type but at the very least I value the fact she actually bothers to try and explain her conclusions e.g. "time sensitive material makes Ni ili seek people out like a greyhound".

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Business is a gamma buzzword more but that's not going to be a decisive factor for typing, heh.
And yet I almost never use that word in my daily speech and I'm not business-orientated at all. If you're so sure that I'm Gamma then why not one of the SFs? I relate to gamma Se-Fi completely.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
(FYI, I still see you as ILI-Te. That subtype would tend towards Delta more than towards Beta. But you have to understand your type for yourself, obviously.)
Ok, but I find it increasingly difficult to believe any type you suggest. Maybe you aren't aware of this but you outright ignored a post containing proof that I relate to (ESTp) 1D Ni after you asked whether or not I relate to it, so you come across as having a confirmation bias.