Quote Originally Posted by Resonare View Post
@Myst We can now rule out ILI since I think I'm an aggressor not a victim.

- I absolutely loathe the idea of being physically vulnerable around anyone to the point where I can't stand wearing less layers of clothing around people.
- I don't deny romantic interest in someone when my friends ask me about it.
- I may not approach romantic interests but it's never been made clear to me by them that they are interested.
- People tend to mistake me for being a weak person but are surprised when I quickly confront them.
- I don't disgust weakness in others like victims are said to. Instead, I actually tend to open up and show kindness to those who submit to me and I am moved by great acts of loyalty.
- In my ideal relationship I am very much the dominant one.
- I prefer to be chased to a certain point before becoming the chaser myself.

I know ILIs/LIEs are also referred to as "psuedo-aggressors" but even that doesn't seem to cover it as they still have a lot of victim qualities that I don't relate to.

Any insights into this matter are more than welcome.
None of your points seemed contradictory to Pseudo-Aggressor to me, ha.

Maybe some other Pseudo-Aggressors, like @Narc and @Adam Strange can chime in on that issue.

In the meantime, I'll just quote DarkAngelFireWolf69 himself: "Pseudo-Aggressors/Employees: LIE (ENTj) ILI (INTp)
These are types who exhibit aggressive tendencies in their everyday life, and as a result tend to carry over these notions and temperaments into their romantic life. They typically are not comfortable with connotations of the word "victim" - implying a certain weakness, effeteness, and lack of dignity. In searching for a partner, they are looking for a worthy opponent - someone who is strong enough to withstand their quirks without "breaking" so to speak."

I'll concur with the previous conclusions of you being most likely an ILI, for the reasons the others have previously mentioned.

Your values are indeed primarily Gamma, and your Ethics are underdeveloped. Your seems to be weak as it is the case for Ni leads. You lack the characteristics of both the Ej and Ij temperaments. (Main reasons: Not "assertive" enough to be Ej, emotions too unstable to be Ij.) Your grasp on related questions/issues was effortlessly strong. Opposed to most LII's, you did not shy away from valuing questions, and do have an idea of right and wrong (even if not in a sophisticated manner as expected for leads; but clearly valuing). You do seem to be PoLR, in the way you are not clearly expressing emotions... generally, your answers in that sector seemed rather obscure, and simply not Fe seeking.

All in all, I also say: ILI.
I may need some more time to determine the subtype. It is possible you have no distinct one. A video could be helpful, but no pressure.