Quote Originally Posted by Deer Woman View Post
Skimmed and I see static/se valuing. Logic > Ethics, although I could consider ESI, because they seem to score surprisingly high on Logic areas.

"I don't think people can truly change but I do believe they can learn to mask it. I tend to be indifferent towards these masks as I tend to let the right people into my life while the people I don't let in usually show their true colors at some point down the line."
Reminded me of:
http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...ic_and_dynamic
I relate more to a dynamic than a static but some of the static things were true. I remember once back in school when my father was unhappy with my grades, I told him him it was an ongoing process that would improve while rolling a hand to which he replied "What? Improve them now" which is something that makes me thing I'm dynamic, but I do see some similarities between the way I present my sentences and the grammatical construction of sentences by statics but this could be down to me having no enthusiasm anymore.

Also, the part about people not changing is to do with me being bullied in the past and what I've observed. Similar to how personality doesn't change, I believe there are certain aspects of every person that do not change but people simply cover them up for their own convenience. I've seen people show prejudice toward other people, befriend and even date people with the same appearance as those they are prejudice against, and then go on to later re-surface their prejudice. Perhaps I have just encountered some rotten people but I honestly do not believe that people can completely change.