Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
There's a link in my signature at the very bottom that directs to a site that has description of the functions. Do you relate to Ni?
I do but I'm not too sure it's strong enough to be my dominant/base function. I certainly notice that I tend to keep a backlog of interactions (that I struggle to accurately remember) which I use to try and figure a problem out if it arises later. I am certainly the type of person that believes in only 1 outcome ever truly being the way things were going to unfold. I remember back in school when I was talking with a friend about personality. I said that personality is something that can never be escaped from and that we are bound to it and it shapes our destiny as the way two personalities will interact has already been determined. Even if a person attempts to act out of person, it is still within their person to attempt to act out of person and they are therefore still acting within their personality. It makes a lot of sense now why we disagreed about it so much as he was ENFp.

Still, I'd rather be typed objectively by you guys rather than by which type I think I could be

Quote Originally Posted by Simo View Post
I don't think ILIs are intimidating and I think they followed your plan because you looked confident rather than intimidating which is something I can relate to when I suggest a plan or an action I can look confident that others just follow
You could very well be right as I've never asked them directly about it.

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
That MBTI "functional stack" thing is bollocks. That's just how you end up scoring in whatever test. It doesn't mean that's how you operate in Model A.

(Note: In the keyscog MBTI function test, I noted that most MBTI INTJs (the ones that I do type as Ni+Te where Ni is dominant, so kinda translates to ILI in socionics alright) do score Te and not much else, the Ni results are usually much lower due to how those test questions are worded on Ni there.)

What in LIE descriptions sounded like you?
The LIE sounds a bit like me before I suddenly became very introverted. Back then I used to be externally focused and my mind was sort of void, but the answers to questions would just come to me. Nowadays I certainly relate more to the INTp description; when I first read this one I was convinced I was INTP (mistook it for MBTI).

Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
I've known LIE with 5w6 core before (though it's quite possible it was a 6w5 actually). I mistook that for ILI initially because I was not so acquainted with the theory yet but since then with more analysis and observation the differences became clear.

Sounds more ILI to me than LIE. LIEs at least have Fe role and they are not obstinate in debates, they will let stuff go after a while if it's not productive enough (4D Te rather than 4D Ti). If the argument is related to resources instead of ideology they will be much more tenacious of course (again, 4D Te over 4D Ti).

Yeah ILIs can be quite the dirty pigs with this stuff. LIEs too, though

Not really

No more questions, only as above.
So you're sure I'm in the gamma quadrant?