Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Yes, Ti is an external IE, more explicit than Fi, able to express the why's. This is where I see Ti in chips.

You in comparison to her sound more vague, less clear, less explicit, less consistent in expressing your thoughts overall. You are somehow rambling, the impression of which I never get from her.

Note this is my Ti ego POV You may not sound vague to some other people. But I find it relevant for typing her.




Why don't you define Fi a bit more clearly than this. From the viewpoint of you as EII. It may help chips.
I suppose for me (when combined with ), is somewhat impressionistic: it manages to capture the whole without being too rigid. But I don't see why this would apply any less to a LII than an EII. So I think the distinction must be more down to areas of competence, as usually associated with type stereotypes. But as I say, not especially useful as a distinction if you consider yourself competent across the board.

It is possible (although I am not sure) that many of my decisions are based more on gut impressions and then are justified more on an ad-hoc basis. I think this may be more in instances where more than one option seems approximately acceptable. In those cases again, I still generally have my reasons for making one decision over another: it is often vital to me e.g. in cases where I must re-evaluate for whatever reason. But again, I don't see this as necessarily alien to a LII.