-
I think you (@chips and underwear) perhaps associate your skills and your mindset as being highly "logical", and the correct way of being, even when it comes to dealing with personal judgements (perhaps especially because you consider all or most evaluations you make as reasonable, qualitative approximations based on well-considered thought processes: you will typically know exactly what your view is on a position, or why you think a certain way, or at least you are able to say that you cannot make a definitive judgment on the matter...and expressing exactly why!: not all individuals are able to readily do this), and so readily identify with
: speaking from my own experience, I could not readily comprehend
, seeing it as a poor imitation of
I also saw myself as being far more "rational" than the vast majority of people (which I probably am).
is just as much about a focus on an internalised systematic, evaluative thought process as
. I think also that
-types in fairly impersonal and/or bookish fields can still excel, although they may find it difficult to have little or no "human" element whatsoever.
whatever you decide, it may be best to simply stick to understanding which information elements and people you value rather than focusing on the exact implications of whatever your type is, and thus trying to live optimally. (It is a very peculiar process to undergo a type change and suddenly seeing that you are scoring differently on tests despite you being the same person! - speaking personally).
Last edited by Subteigh; 10-06-2015 at 06:22 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules