Quote Originally Posted by glam View Post
chips, this really does sound EII to me, and not LII. i think i've mentioned thinking EII for you in the past too. i've had a hard time seeing you as LII, because i never see hard Ti analysis in your posts. your communication and verbalization is usually more Fi-oriented, you seem confident in making Fi evaluations and acting upon them (as you describe in the 1st paragraph in the quoted post), and you always talk about "relating" or "not relating" to things. also, i see you often asking for feedback, seeming unsure about your ideas and conclusions (weak Te). i think LIIs tend to be much more sure on their opinions about such things - they don't need anyone to "confirm" their ideas (not that they won't talk about them with others). and you're right that LIIs don't typically display the kind of sensitivity you mention. there's a reason why IxTx communication style is called "Cold-blooded"

it also sounds like you'd be an Oldham Sensitive type, which i would guess tends to correlate more to the Sincere (IxFx) communication style.
She says: "Then I wonder if it’s even valid to be thinking such a thing when no one seems to agree"

How is that confidence in Fi as in lead Fi types?... Nope.


Quote Originally Posted by glam View Post
i know that they're lookalike types, but an LII having a pronounced Fi role doesn't really explain what i see as defining behavior and functional strengths for chips. i see her consistently using Fi-related semantics in her communication, and by her own description in this post, she is comfortable making Fi judgments and acting on them. explaining away this Fi focus doesn't somehow make her LII. and i think her sense of humor is very Ne (which makes sense given that Ne is her Creative function and likely her subtype).
Again, try not to confuse Fi role with Fi base. I noticed people do make that mistake sometimes. I've seen her make judgments out of Ti however, instead of Fi.