Page 15 of 16 FirstFirst ... 5111213141516 LastLast
Results 561 to 600 of 609

Thread: Gamma Duality

  1. #561
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    3,607
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    Jobs could be LII.

    Attachment 15966

    LSI is also possible according to my VI, but ILI is too far off.
    Well VI is meh but he looks too manly and solid for LII IMO. You could sharpen a saw with his jawline.

  2. #562
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    TIM
    ESI?
    Posts
    1,729
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Well VI is meh but he looks too manly and solid for LII IMO. You could sharpen a saw with his jawline.
    Lol. I focus mainly on the eyes and gestalt of the entire expression with him. There's a certain heated intensity and focus in his eyes that makes me want to lean more towards LSI. But I definitely think he's Ti-dom. George Lucas might be the most closely comparable VI in his younger years, and he could be the LII while Jobs is the LSI.

    Edit: Definitely leaning more towards LSI for Jobs now. Also note an odd resemblance to Tom Cruise in his pictures. Might be related, or not, but I think Cruise might be EIE.

  3. #563
    Uncle Ave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    TIM
    LIE-H sp/sx
    Posts
    4,370
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    Fair enough. That just shows that his motivations aren't about money at all and he doesn't care about growing other people's money either. He simply plays by his own rules, not those of the stock market. Ti > Te.
    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    LSI don't want to operate under the rules of the society or rules of "common sense" (these are all mostly Te)
    I don't think this is a fair assesment or understanding of Te at all.

    As a Te lead I don't care about rules or follow them at all. That means I don't make my own rules nor do I care about society's. I do agree that Te egos involved in business (whether myself or other Te egos I have known) are likely to rely on external measurements such as benefits (at least in part) to gauge how much potential is being developped by their business undertakings. But to be fair I've seen EIEs and LSIs do this too - neither the Te egos nor the Ti valuers I have worked with reduce the success of the business simply to money. I do see EIEs follow the rules of society( at least laws and regulations) in an almost obsessive compulsive sense.

    LSIs do seem to follow a more invisible set of rules though, yes.

    It's interesting how I heard other LSIs, I do think it was Myst but also squark, say something similar about Te being more "conforming" in a general sense, which sounds similar to your remark about Te playing by society's rules and "common sense". Perhaps it appears that way, I think LIEs and LSIs deeply misunderstand each others use of logic, lol.


  4. #564
    Uncle Ave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    TIM
    LIE-H sp/sx
    Posts
    4,370
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    And he’s too inventive and too random and undisciplined to be LIE.
    LIE-Creative is inventive and fairly undisciplined - they differ from ILEs though in that they try to apply their invetions and/or through active experimentation. ILEs are more likely to play around with their understanding of things in their mind, it seems.

    LSI-Creative is also an odd one. They are the LSIs who invent contraptions and weird shit. I once saw this LSI dude in a documentary that made these bdsm machines. Unfortunately I didn't register his name - nor that of the documentary. He seems to fit the bill.

    I don't think Musk is LSI simply because his vision is too broad - LSIs rarely become CEOs of large tech companies because from what I can tell they are better at leading small groups. Ne pols can be creative(sometimes very much so) but don't seem to have a "general vision" of things.


  5. #565

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,785
    Mentioned
    1078 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Just because he looks evil and is artsy
    he's not evil. just bigger brother
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  6. #566
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE (N) 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    633
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Ave View Post
    I don't think this is a fair assesment or understanding of Te at all.

    As a Te lead I don't care about rules or follow them at all. That means I don't make my own rules nor do I care about society's. I do agree that Te egos involved in business (whether myself or other Te egos I have known) are likely to rely on external measurements such as benefits (at least in part) to gauge how much potential is being developped by their business undertakings. But to be fair I've seen EIEs and LSIs do this too - neither the Te egos nor the Ti valuers I have worked with reduce the success of the business simply to money. I do see EIEs follow the rules of society( at least laws and regulations) in an almost obsessive compulsive sense.

    LSIs do seem to follow a more invisible set of rules though, yes.

    It's interesting how I heard other LSIs, I do think it was Myst but also squark, say something similar about Te being more "conforming" in a general sense, which sounds similar to your remark about Te playing by society's rules and "common sense". Perhaps it appears that way, I think LIEs and LSIs deeply misunderstand each others use of logic, lol.
    It is a simplified caricature, yes. Te leads might not always follow rules either, but they are, like you said, more attentive of external measurements and doing things in a more universally accepted way. Money and stock price are well-known external measurements, but it could also be the effectiveness of operations. For example, OEE (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overal..._effectiveness) is definitely something that Gamma NT often seem to be passionate about. My grandfather was as LIE as they come, he even wrote a couple of books on those matters during his time as a professor of industrial engineering.

    Ti rules are invisible and personal, they are matters of principle not held to any external standard, not all that unlike Fi except more structured and logically defined. Musk didn't flinch at losing large amounts of stock valuation just to make the point that money isn't important to him.

    To be fair, anyone that is hugely successful is hardly a garden-variety example of their type. Lucky or not, I don't see LSI being a disqualifier for being a successful CEO (although many might argue that his leadership style is far from optimal for this purpose). I agree that leading small groups is typically more comfortable for LSI, but having a "general vision" to follow is not atypical (although this vision might be adopted from someone more visionary, possibly EIE).

  7. #567
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    TIM
    ESI?
    Posts
    1,729
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Ave View Post
    I don't think this is a fair assesment or understanding of Te at all.

    As a Te lead I don't care about rules or follow them at all. That means I don't make my own rules nor do I care about society's. I do agree that Te egos involved in business (whether myself or other Te egos I have known) are likely to rely on external measurements such as benefits (at least in part) to gauge how much potential is being developped by their business undertakings. But to be fair I've seen EIEs and LSIs do this too - neither the Te egos nor the Ti valuers I have worked with reduce the success of the business simply to money. I do see EIEs follow the rules of society( at least laws and regulations) in an almost obsessive compulsive sense.

    LSIs do seem to follow a more invisible set of rules though, yes.

    It's interesting how I heard other LSIs, I do think it was Myst but also squark, say something similar about Te being more "conforming" in a general sense, which sounds similar to your remark about Te playing by society's rules and "common sense". Perhaps it appears that way, I think LIEs and LSIs deeply misunderstand each others use of logic, lol.
    If you ever watched Dexter, you would discover that Beta Js follow rules obsessively to hide their crimes.

  8. #568

    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    TIM
    ILI-Te Sx-Sp
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Glad you guys agree Elon isn't LIE, I've had enough of that shit on VK. (Russia facebook)

  9. #569
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    TIM
    ESI?
    Posts
    1,729
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Accipiter View Post
    Glad you guys agree Elon isn't LIE, I've had enough of that shit on VK. (Russia facebook)
    I agree that he is LIE, so I don't agree that he isn't LIE.

  10. #570
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    3,607
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Accipiter View Post
    Glad you guys agree Elon isn't LIE, I've had enough of that shit on VK. (Russia facebook)
    If you click on his type thread, there’s a poll on there, and most people think he’s LIE by far. Sorry to burst your bubble.

  11. #571

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,785
    Mentioned
    1078 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Accipiter View Post
    Glad you guys agree Elon isn't LIE, I've had enough of that shit on VK. (Russia facebook)
    LIE is close to his ENTP
    In ex-USSR there are 2 popular social networks: ok.ru and vk.com . The 2nd seems has joined with FB recently.

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    If you click on his type thread, there’s a poll on there, and most people think he’s LIE by far
    53% at now
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  12. #572
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    3,607
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    LIE is close to his ENTP
    In ex-USSR there are 2 popular social networks: ok.ru and vk.com . The 2nd seems has joined with FB recently.



    53% at now
    Ok when you say it like that it makes it sound like “barely most”, when it’s actually way more than what they think any of the other types are individually. It’s not like 47% think he’s LSI, the remaining 47% is dispersed throughout 15 other types. Te is so manipulative and assholish with info lol.

  13. #573

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,785
    Mentioned
    1078 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Ok when you say it like that it makes it sound like “barely most”, when it’s actually
    53% is "barely most" actually. it's a fact
    Also people who vote on forums and alike are just random people, the most of which are not supposed to have good typing skills and have high conformism.

    For voting is more useful the matches between those who creates own types lists of famouses. Among Russian sites such was SSS, which does not work as should in last time. Mb there are other similar bases about Jung types of famouses. Such votings are also not good due to similar reasons, which just have lesser degree than more random people on forums.
    Also would be interesting to know what people think independently, before knowing others' opinions. But it's hard to get such data about famouses.

    > Te is so manipulative

    Your incorrectness related mostly to Ti - formal term about the majority. While Te helped to notice the practical sense of the real value.
    You said alike there is significant "most" with same opinion, what is wrong. Then you've added additional params which alike disprove that I'm wrong in pointing that the "most" has no significant expression - and here you was wrong again. After you being wrong 2 times you claim that it's me who said wrong.

    The manipulative is your F ego, which leads to worse understanding of T themes and such to regular mistakes there, and inappropriately expresses emotions in logical questions.

    P.S. To suppose S types as good in being creative with new ideas is close to nonsense. Champions as Jobs in a region are almost always have strong that function. It's not enough to reject S type, but enough to highly doubt in it for him. I mostly type by nonverbal impressions and what I feel fits to theory better. Nonverbal approach to people who you know rather limitly and surfacely, and even with doubtful info sometimes, as famouses - is better than anything.

    wbr
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  14. #574
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    3,607
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    53% is "barely most" actually. it's a fact
    Also people who vote on forums and alike are just random people, the most of which are not supposed to have good typing skills and have high conformism.

    For voting is more useful the matches between those who creates own types lists of famouses. Among Russian sites such was SSS, which does not work as should in last time. Mb there are other similar bases about Jung types of famouses. Such votings are also not good due to similar reasons, which just have lesser degree than more random people on forums.
    Also would be interesting to know what people think independently, before knowing others' opinions. But it's hard to get such data about famouses.

    > Te is so manipulative

    Your incorrectness related mostly to Ti - formal term about the majority. While Te helped to notice the practical sense of the real value.
    You said alike there is significant "most" with same opinion, what is wrong. Then you've added additional params which alike disprove that I'm wrong in pointing that the "most" has no significant expression - and here you was wrong again. After you being wrong 2 times you claim that it's me who said wrong.

    The manipulative is your F ego, which leads to worse understanding of T themes and such to regular mistakes there, and inappropriately expresses emotions in logical questions.

    P.S. To suppose S types as good in being creative with new ideas is close to nonsense. Champions as Jobs in a region are almost always have strong that function. It's not enough to reject S type, but enough to highly doubt in it for him. I mostly type by nonverbal impressions and what I feel fits to theory better. Nonverbal approach to people who you know rather limitly and surfacely, and even with doubtful info sometimes, as famouses - is better than anything.

    wbr
    If someone clicks on the poll and takes one look at it, they will go “wow, most people think he’s LIE by far”, because by far more people think of him as LIE than any other one type. Considering we have SIXTEEN different types, the fact that ONE type out of SIXTEEN amassed 53% on its OWN (or even an amount like 30%) is huge. I hate it when people manipulate presentation of numbers for misleading people who are not as observant at math or more impressionable. Sorry, I’m not going to teach a 40 year old LSE how to interpret statistics today in a basic way. You’re supposed to have 4D Te too, stop using it for being silly and fingering your own asshole.

  15. #575
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    3,607
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Its like if I said “most people’s favorite ice cream is vanilla or chocolate by far”, and vanilla or chocolate make up 53% out of a whole bunch of other possible flavors, but you’re like HURR DURR NOOOOOO people also choze strawburry sumtimez (e.g. 20%, which is less than half of the top #1 choice), so saying “most by far” it’s NOT TRUUUUEEEEEE

  16. #576

    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Everywhere and Nowhere
    TIM
    LIE-Te 8W7
    Posts
    689
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    LSI don't want to operate under the rules of the society or rules of "common sense" (these are all mostly Te), instead following his own personally created rules (Ti) and making his underlings follow them without question (creative Se).
    That's not true, common sense is, if anything, more like Fe. In the description of LIE is written: "they live by their own principles which don't necessarily match those of the societies they live in but have been formed according to the LIE's own observations and experiences"
    Which has been absolutely true in my personal life as well

    I have a feeling that you haven't read a real description about LIEs yet:
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-Rational-ENTj

  17. #577
    mfckrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    303
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Accipiter View Post
    I don't even like admitting that Elon Musk is an LIE. He's so disconnected from how things should be, he doesn't understand the typical role of a CEO, he would rather pick fights on twitter than act professional, and he doesn't care about his actions in relation to his companies (or their stock prices, I have so, so many examples of this.)
    I can't accept that anyone would put him as a Te subtype LIE. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but this guy is much too disconnected from the way reality works. Even just the way he runs his companies, sure he's a workaholic, but you can tell he didn't care about a majority share, until he was bit with reality, unlike 'real' LIEs like Jeff Bezos who understand how things work ahead of time. How many LIEs are going to tank their stock by admitting "Tesla is overvalued imo". Half of this guy is like a child.
    These are criticisms of decorum rather than efficacy. Elon Musk remains a radically successful billionaire, so whatever he's doing appears to be working—"muh professionalism" be damned.

    Bezos is probably LSE. He's more a logistics wizard than an industry innovator, with a talent for flattening supplychains. Similar to what Sam Walton (another delta-ST) did with Walmart.

  18. #578

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LIE-Ni sx/so
    Posts
    692
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mfckrz View Post
    These are criticisms of decorum rather than efficacy. Elon Musk remains a radically successful billionaire, so whatever he's doing appears to be working—"muh professionalism" be damned.

    Bezos is probably LSE. He's more a logistics wizard than an industry innovator, with a talent for flattening supplychains. Similar to what Sam Walton (another delta-ST) did with Walmart.
    He started off wealthy, and it's very dubious that he's successful. I mean, some inventors on his payroll sometimes are...but is that really 'succcess'?
    ENTj-Ni sx/so

  19. #579
    NightHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Land of the Free
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    103
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've always pegged Elon as a feeling type. He is a hopeless romantic, as you can see from how he talks about his idea of love in interviews. I also feel like he has Ne, not Ni.

    Edit: I did some research. Really not sure what he is. He just seems very emotional. I suppose what I am seeing is a childlike behavior about him, and a childlike outlook about the world. He seems to see possibilities, not reality.

  20. #580
    mfckrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    303
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nanashi View Post
    He started off wealthy, and it's very dubious that he's successful. I mean, some inventors on his payroll sometimes are...but is that really 'succcess'?
    $38.2B net worth… 7 kids… founded SpaceX which just put Americans back into space again after NASA's shameful 10yr hiatus…

    Dunno what metrics you use, but he sounds like a successful person to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by NightHawk View Post
    I've always pegged Elon as a feeling type. He is a hopeless romantic, as you can see from how he talks about his idea of love in interviews.
    What interviews? Could easily be an expression of dual-seeking inferior Fi.

    He seems to see possibilities, not reality.
    The dude is tremendously wealthy via his own efforts, I really don't think his reality testing is suspect.

  21. #581
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    7,940
    Mentioned
    886 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    4D Te = Assigning names to things in the environment so they can be isolated and distinguished from each other.
    3D Ni = Seeing one, best possible course of action from the many possibilities.
    2D Se = Seeing reality as it is, not as you wish it was. Note that it is subservient to 3D Ni, but still workable.
    1D Fi = Assigning personal value. Not so good at this at all, but an object's price can be used as a workable substitute.

  22. #582

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LIE-Ni sx/so
    Posts
    692
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mfckrz View Post
    $38.2B net worth… 7 kids… founded SpaceX which just put Americans back into space again after NASA's shameful 10yr hiatus…

    Dunno what metrics you use, but he sounds like a successful person to me.



    What interviews? Could easily be an expression of dual-seeking inferior Fi.



    The dude is tremendously wealthy via his own efforts, I really don't think his reality testing is suspect.
    Uh....going to his high school (provided I found the correct one), costs a fifth of a million dollars now.I'm not sure what it cost his parents, but his dad was an engineer in South Africa....His family was wealthy. I don't see Musk as successful nor happy. His relationships do not seem to bring him joy, and when you get past the starry-eye inducing marketing...he's throwing money around and treating the people poorly who work at his company.What about his innovations? So much seem to be the work of others, and he simply tries to finance those...while treating people poorly.
    ENTj-Ni sx/so

  23. #583
    shotgunfingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    the rice fields
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mfckrz View Post
    $38.2B net worth… 7 kids… founded SpaceX which just put Americans back into space again after NASA's shameful 10yr hiatus…

    Dunno what metrics you use, but he sounds like a successful person to me.



    What interviews? Could easily be an expression of dual-seeking inferior Fi.



    The dude is tremendously wealthy via his own efforts, I really don't think his reality testing is suspect.
    Wealth = / = happiness ask Adam Strange. After you make a certain quantity of money its just managing assets vs liabilities and investing. If you enjoy that it can bring some happiness... but money comes with social issues. People behave differently if they know you are well off and you can't trust them anymore..

    The guy's love life is a disaster. He seems to enjoy his achievements tho, so who knows. Successful for sure, 7 kids . I'd call that success.

    Imo Elon is Alpha quadra. Ne-Ti ILE
    Last edited by shotgunfingers; 06-09-2020 at 08:27 AM.

  24. #584
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE (N) 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    633
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The comments here support the obvious fact that Musk is not Gamma.

  25. #585
    shotgunfingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    the rice fields
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    The comments here support the obvious fact that Musk is not Gamma.
    every "libertarian" entrepreneur I know hates the guy mostly for the reasons expressed in this thread. That speaks volumes. Libertarians like Ron Paul & Hans-Hermann Hoppe types are stereotypical gammas. "The efficiency of the free market" .. and all that. M-muh Ayn Rand.

    Elon is a chill guy who smoked weed on Joe Rogan's show. He is cool with me, the guy is Te demonstrative:

    Though the ILE can demonstrate a head for practical or efficient reasoning, particularly in conjunction with the ignoring function Ni, he will typically resort to it only to sell the merits of his ideas. The ILE is more concerned with the possibility of creating than in finding the best way to do something.
    When the demand exists, the ILE will deliver a practical and realistic rationale or solution, but be prepared for a tack that is singularly unorthodox. The ILE will not be boxed in by the rules of convention, rather he will actively search for a new way to perform a task. In this way, ILEs are often seen cutting corners. To others, this may be seen as snubbing the rules, and rightfully so, because the ILE dislikes the idea of a preset way of performing a task. It is counter-intuitive to their Ego. To the ILE, they are more likely playfully reinventing convention in order to show how their skills are best used or perhaps to prove that their manner of approaching the task surpasses that of Te-ego types in efficiency and practicality.
    Elon is based, has 7 kids. Haters gonna hate.

    Last edited by shotgunfingers; 06-09-2020 at 09:23 AM.

  26. #586
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE (N) 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    633
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILE is not a bad typing, but he is beta, more exactly LSI-Creative with accentuated Ne/Se. That makes for an ILE-like surface persona with LSI information metabolism.

  27. #587
    shotgunfingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    the rice fields
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    ILE is not a bad typing, but he is beta, more exactly LSI-Creative with accentuated Ne/Se. That makes for an ILE-like surface persona with LSI information metabolism.
    interesting! Lmao (I seem to like a lot of beta things)

    EDIT: under MBTI he is considered INTJ. Apparently he did the official test and all that (wouldn't surprise me)

  28. #588
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE (N) 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    633
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, MBTI types most people that are smart as N-types even if they actually aren't.

  29. #589
    shotgunfingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    the rice fields
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    Yeah, MBTI types most people that are smart as N-types even if they actually aren't.
    I was thinking of maybe making a type me vid talking about something random e_e.. not sure if its a bad idea tho.

  30. #590
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE (N) 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    633
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shotgunfingers View Post
    I was thinking of maybe making a type me vid talking about something random e_e.. not sure if its a bad idea tho.
    Depends on if you're willing to deal with silly and/or very surface level typings. But you could receive get some good insights too.

  31. #591

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,785
    Mentioned
    1078 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    Depends on if you're willing to deal with silly and/or very surface level typings.
    The silly is to trust to baseless nonsense as Gulenko's subtypes, to incompetent, heretical baseless and very speculative opinions of noobs about your type and types in general, to own type without its IR checking. To bark on people when geting disagreements.

    You have irrational aversion to VI due to personal reasons as
    - emotional reasons to assign and after barking with people to keep SLE, for what you have no good basis which includes positive IR checking what you'd failed as SLE is wrong. you base the opinion on what incompetent noobs say to you and your same incompetent surfacely and bs (as Gulenko's subtypes) argumented fantasing. that it's not SLE my opinion is based mainly on VI, though possible traits of your type are seen in your behavior on the forum, as more possibility of J type based on your good structured talking style, Fe value due to inadequate morality in my perception, grammar accentuated reaction pointing on Ti value, etc.
    - your possible Se type with weak nonvalued Ne, while VI uses mostly Ne
    - your possible base Ti type having lesser objectivity and higher wish to logical speculations.

    The surface typing is to use for people which you know badly as main info of what people say publicly about themselves (especially when they know the theory) and what is said publicly about them by others (especially when those are not well known to them) and to ignore other important info as nonverbal behavior. There are distortions in self-perception as in other case tests would be highly correct. People are often prejusticed to some types traits and types to filter and distort the info about themselves, partly unconsciously. So what people say is rather limited and also doubtful, filtered and sometimes incorrect info. Besides being significantly not trusty, this info has multiple interpretations due to _many_ different strong factors which may give same behavior besides Jung types. Than what people say during typings it's more interesting how they behave and talk - what you see yourself, though they may play to some degree (especially having types theory knowledge).
    Compared to that, nonverbal behavior has far lesser distortions than what people say about them and others, and has lesser influence of external factors (in types related part). Nonverbal is most natural peoples behavior to analyse in typing. So to use VI is important and should be main method for typing - as it gives the least chance to be misleaded.

    The silly is to recommend not giving a video following to personal reasons, while it is the best material for nonverbal. When about nonverbal is:
    1) the type is expressed in nonverbal behavior by Augustinivichiute's texts. besides it's evident about some types traits that, for example, higher emotionality in the consciousnes should correlate with higher emotionality in nonverbal
    2) nonverbal is widely used to type. it's evident that much of intuitive impressions about people' personal traits follow from their nonverbal and that typers use N too, which is just one of 4 mind functions. many typers prefer to have IRL contact, videos, photos - which give nonverbal
    3) since 2015 there is my objective proof that nonverbal has useful info for typing which can be analysed by intuitive VI. not even trained, random forum noobs gave up to ~20% average _real_ typing match by intuitive VI of random youtube bloggers. in case there was no useful data in nonverbal or intuitive VI did not worked - they'd gave close to accidental 6% match. this ~20% is similar to gotten by IRL interviews in one of experiments SRT-99

    You are objectively the very novice with minimum knowledge and practice to trust to your typing skills, the novice who argues with and ignores the recommendations of those who have far more theory knowledge and practice, you trust to random nonsense hypotheses, etc. You ignore the objectivity, hysterically bark to supress your criticism by emotions and this is not silly for your speculative mind.

    > But you could receive get some good insights too.

    As nonverbal is a part of useful info for typing and video is best material for nonverbal, then giving this info rises the chance to get the correct type. To type better by VI, as by any method, needs skills and practice to get them. Better the practice based on correct theory, but not random heresies as Reinin's traits. Also the material should fit to recommendations.
    To type not well-known people, VI is best as main method. In case of typology knowledge by a typed human questionnaires are low trusty material. Some better is with tests, where the more problem is the accuracy.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  32. #592
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    3,607
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shotgunfingers View Post
    interesting! Lmao (I seem to like a lot of beta things)

    EDIT: under MBTI he is considered INTJ. Apparently he did the official test and all that (wouldn't surprise me)
    That’s interesting. I could deal with an Elon INTJ MBTI typing. For a while I thought he might be ILI. I think he’s an ILI-ish LIE.

  33. #593

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,785
    Mentioned
    1078 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    Yeah, MBTI types most people that are smart as N-types even if they actually aren't.
    MBTI is dichotomies test which fits to Jung/Socionics theory and is very similar to tests used in Socionics. So MBTI types to N types by traits which relate to this.
    Also MBTI users prefer to hold MBTI results after inteview in most cases (>70%), what prevents strong mistakes from wrong ideas.

    Besides being incompetent, you are predisposed to baseless speculations.
    To the degree to keep doubts in your T type still, as you easily produce primitive and wrong thoughts. Having a predisposition to emotionally motivated gossips.

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    ILE is not a bad typing, but he is beta, more exactly LSI-Creative with accentuated Ne/Se.
    ILE and LSI are not close types to say such mismatch as not bad

    there are no types "LSI-Creative" in Socionics
    to have accentuated Ne and Se in the same time is impossibly. as stronger N means weaker S and functions develop similarly in both E/I variants

    You ignore basic theory and trust to nonsense heresies.
    Last edited by Sol; 06-09-2020 at 01:19 PM.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  34. #594

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,785
    Mentioned
    1078 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shotgunfingers View Post
    I was thinking of maybe making a type me vid talking about something random e_e.. not sure if its a bad idea tho.
    It's bad idea if objective reality you prefer lesser than fantasies. As with more of useful and difficult to be faslificated data it will be harder to mislead yourself and others about your type, while by emotional reasons you may prefer to assign yourself some incorrect type.
    Same bad as to take seriously opinions about the typology of fresh noobs on forums.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  35. #595
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE (N) 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    633
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    The silly is to trust to baseless nonsense as Gulenko's subtypes, to incompetent, heretical baseless and very speculative opinions of noobs about your type and types in general, to own type without its IR checking. To bark on people when geting disagreements.

    You have irrational aversion to VI due to personal reasons as
    - emotional reasons to assign and after barking with people to keep SLE, for what you have no good basis which includes positive IR checking what you'd failed as SLE is wrong. you base the opinion on what incompetent noobs say to you and your same incompetent surfacely and bs (as Gulenko's subtypes) argumented fantasing. that it's not SLE my opinion is based mainly on VI, though possible traits of your type are seen in your behavior on the forum, as more possibility of J type based on your good structured talking style, Fe value due to inadequate morality in my perception, grammar accentuated reaction pointing on Ti value, etc.
    - your possible Se type with weak nonvalued Ne, while VI uses mostly Ne
    - your possible base Ti type having lesser objectivity and higher wish to logical speculations.
    Get over the joke, your Fi is still butthurt I see.

    You have trouble with reading comprehension. I have no aversion to VI, on the contrary, I think it is interesting and useful. The comment was to illustrate the fact that his experience is going to be a mixed bag. I can deal with receiving poor typings, but I won't always be diplomatic when responding to them if they are presented in a way that annoys me. By the way, why don't you put your money where your mouth is, Sol, and post your own VI video. What do you have to lose?

    The rest of your lecture is redundant since I'm not at all opposed to VI in principle. Don't just trust someone being good in VI because they claim so. Use your own critical thinking, some people will provide a reasoning behind their VI typing, some won't. It's fine either way, but with reasoning you have an easier time to evaluate said typings.

    Yes, it's also abundantly clear that you have trouble with socionics concepts developed during the recent three decades, you can claim heresy all you want. Everyone has heard it already and nobody cares.

  36. #596
    mfckrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    303
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shotgunfingers View Post
    Wealth = / = happiness ask Adam Strange.
    Adam Strange (LSE) can't even type himself correctly, who cares what he thinks about anything in this context.

    Imo Elon is Alpha quadra. Ne-Ti ILE
    Ridiculous typing.

  37. #597
    mfckrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    303
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nanashi View Post
    Uh....going to his high school (provided I found the correct one), costs a fifth of a million dollars now.I'm not sure what it cost his parents, but his dad was an engineer in South Africa....His family was wealthy. I don't see Musk as successful nor happy. His relationships do not seem to bring him joy, and when you get past the starry-eye inducing marketing...he's throwing money around and treating the people poorly who work at his company.What about his innovations? So much seem to be the work of others, and he simply tries to finance those...while treating people poorly.
    Did he inherit $38.2B? Obviously not. Starting well-off doesn't in any way diminish his achievements given their scope.

  38. #598

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LIE-Ni sx/so
    Posts
    692
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mfckrz View Post
    Did he inherit $38.2B? Obviously not. Starting well-off doesn't in any way diminish his achievements given their scope.
    but...yes, starting well-off does change the likelihood he will be able to achieve. And I'm not saying achievements are diminished. I'm saying impressiveness is. What diminished his achievements is finding out how many aren't his intellectual work
    ENTj-Ni sx/so

  39. #599
    mfckrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    303
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nanashi View Post
    but...yes, starting well-off does change the likelihood he will be able to achieve. And I'm not saying achievements are diminished. I'm saying impressiveness is. What diminished his achievements is finding out how many aren't his intellectual work
    How in the world would you even know what is his intellectual work? You don't. You're just casting shade on him because you've decided you don't like something about him (which may or may not even be true). Surely you are smarter than this.

  40. #600

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LIE-Ni sx/so
    Posts
    692
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mfckrz View Post
    How in the world would you even know what is his intellectual work? You don't. You're just casting shade on him because you've decided you don't like something about him (which may or may not even be true). Surely you are smarter than this.
    No, you misunderstand me....I mean when one reads his interviews where he explicitly defines innovations people assume are his intellectual work as NOT his.
    ENTj-Ni sx/so

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •