Quote Originally Posted by Mega View Post
this thread makes me cringe by the lack of actual facts.
Just to be boring: written socionics' theory is already a bit blurry and hard as fck to get someone's type right considering it's how ppl comprehend the world and themselves in the world. It can lead to certain behaviours, but afaik it's not a golden rule to say that if someone act or dress a certain way then he's this type 100%. By this simple thought, pictures about people have no significance over some peeps type, it shows how they dress, and if you're some crazy psyche you can approximately deduce what their behaviour is (and that's a big motherfucker if here).

So, how I see it, it's some bunch of people fantasizing about some romance they could have had with someone and how that'd have made them feel.

I'm not saying that everything you've posted is wrong (i actually don't know), sometimes it just seems like you pulled it out of your ass from a previous feeling or desire you've experienced or have wanted to experience.
You are making non-factual assumptions yourself about the motives of people posting here


Quote Originally Posted by Mega View Post
With the underlying assumption that the images posted first had the right "stereotyped" idea of the quadra. Which has the underlying assumption that each duality has general stereotyped vibe.
IMO, the duality images have more to do with fucking enneagrams (because it relate to real world stuff and how you act in your world) than fucking socionics.

Funny thing is that Augusta created socionics in the first place because she thought there was something somewhere that had a correlation with social types, for exemple the nerd, the hardworker, and so on. For that she used IM that describes how you understand the world and how you understand how you fit in that world. That's a big ass fucking assumption to begin a fucking theory on, IMO.
You're no Alpha NT for sure lol