You said "it's the only general model we have for normal psychological functioning." Ie. that it's the sole, valid interpretation of how a normal psyche functions. Therefore, your viewpoint amounts to a claim that it's the absolute truth, or the "gospel truth." What about the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, or Kernsberg's model of personality organization, or Big 5, HEXACO, MBTI, WHODAS, or any model that could be synthesized from these systems? You've obviously disregarded them in favor of Socionics, once again dovetailing with the fact that you take Socionics as the gospel truth.
This is what you had to say about ADD in the thread I made about ADD earlier:
That's not taking the criteria for ADD with a "grain of salt." Your viewpoint on the matter amounts to conspiracy theory.
If you think that functioning is "Te", then you confuse objective reality with subjective reality in that you think that objective phenomena literally amount to information elements. Ie. you're tacitly roping people into your worldview about what reality even is with the theories posted on your website. So I'm not interested in reading your website.



Reply With Quote