View Poll Results: type of Jordan Peterson?

Voters
111. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE (ENTp)

    4 3.60%
  • SEI (ISFp)

    0 0%
  • ESE (ESFj)

    2 1.80%
  • LII (INTj)

    21 18.92%
  • SLE (ESTp)

    0 0%
  • IEI (INFp)

    8 7.21%
  • EIE (ENFj)

    35 31.53%
  • LSI (ISTj)

    8 7.21%
  • SEE (ESFp)

    1 0.90%
  • ILI (INTp)

    10 9.01%
  • LIE (ENTj)

    19 17.12%
  • ESI (ISFj)

    4 3.60%
  • IEE (ENFp)

    1 0.90%
  • SLI (ISTp)

    1 0.90%
  • LSE (ESTj)

    4 3.60%
  • EII (INFj)

    2 1.80%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 40 of 1224

Thread: Jordan Peterson

Threaded View

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    TIM
    ILI - C
    Posts
    1,810
    Mentioned
    114 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I never said Jung or Augusta should be taken as gospel truth,
    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    But I do think socionics can help answer that question since it's essentially the only general model we have for normal psychological functioning (albeit very schematic in its current form).
    You said "it's the only general model we have for normal psychological functioning." Ie. that it's the sole, valid interpretation of how a normal psyche functions. Therefore, your viewpoint amounts to a claim that it's the absolute truth, or the "gospel truth." What about the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, or Kernsberg's model of personality organization, or Big 5, HEXACO, MBTI, WHODAS, or any model that could be synthesized from these systems? You've obviously disregarded them in favor of Socionics, once again dovetailing with the fact that you take Socionics as the gospel truth.

    This is what you had to say about ADD in the thread I made about ADD earlier:

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Ne is real, ADD is a fictional disorder used to drug up young children.
    That's not taking the criteria for ADD with a "grain of salt." Your viewpoint on the matter amounts to conspiracy theory.

    If you think that functioning is "Te", then you confuse objective reality with subjective reality in that you think that objective phenomena literally amount to information elements. Ie. you're tacitly roping people into your worldview about what reality even is with the theories posted on your website. So I'm not interested in reading your website.
    Last edited by Desert Financial; 12-18-2018 at 10:11 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •