Did anyone get hands on that new book and translate it?
@mu @silke
Did anyone get hands on that new book and translate it?
@mu @silke
There's a new book? Where? Please, please tell me.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
@Elina might have it
wb Refi![]()
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Well who knows? If Jung didn't invent the cognitive functions theory, maybe someone else would have further down the road. And then someone else other than Ausra could have invented what is now known as 'socionics.'
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
why are there always these periodic disputes that come up about Jung vs socionics? it's not that hard to understand: Jung first observed and wrote about functions, and Aushra used his ideas (and others') to create socionics. so people who really want to understand the theory behind socionics can read Jung as well as Aushra. also, socionics is a Jungian typology, but not all Jungian typologies are socionics. so reading Jung alone isn't going to teach you socionics, but doing so can be valuable for your understanding of the theory. to declare Jung/socionics as one and the same, or as two completely separate theories that should never be talked about together - both views are wrong and unhelpful, IMO.
Getting some good Socionics book(s) out in English would help with making Socionics more internationally known. Put it on Amazon, voilá.