Introduction to Psyche-Yoga

[The Reality Denialist]

Profiles vs positions makes it quite interesting. When I use positional descriptions instead of type descriptions I can easily type myself, however when I read about type profiles it becomes a huge mess.

[Dauphin]

https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&rurl=translate.google.co m&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://web.archive.org/web/20130508130921/http://www.strannik.de/lovesyntax/map.htm&xid=17259,15700023,15700186,15700190,15700 253&usg=ALkJrhgIh_EXpn847xUA2A4GvSTf2g-Tsw

This has the best descriptions I could find.

[miss BabyDoll]

taking dichotomies into consideration - strong/weak (1,2; 3,4 respectively) block (where strong - confident, M.O. functions and weak - PoLR, unused, passive functions), resultative/processive, (1,4; 2,3 respectively) (where resultative - non- negotiable,dismissive functions and processive - slow building, processing functions) and dominant/adapted (1,3; 2,4 respectively) (where dominant - reason of activity functions and adapted passive functions i definitely fall into LVFE.

edit*
did the test for test's sake

Logic: 29 points out of 30
Emotion: 1 point out of 30
Physics: 12 points out of 30
Will: 22 points out of 30
Prospective type: LVFE

[Moonbeaux Rainfox]

Psyche Yoga descriptions

Why people might find them so interesting is, that they have something qualia grasping (and in a more different way) about them.

[saskiaza21]

When , i tested on attitudinal psyche. I tested as VELF , but while i was reading VELF description. I didn't relate to it.
I tested again and i got EFLV. I relate it , coz i'm a person who really confident with emotion but unassertive ( low V )