If you were to boil down what each type speaks what would you say?
For instance I would say
I only speak love, friendship, relationship and warmth.
And an LSE would say
I only speak English, profanity, sarcasm and real shit
If you were to boil down what each type speaks what would you say?
For instance I would say
I only speak love, friendship, relationship and warmth.
And an LSE would say
I only speak English, profanity, sarcasm and real shit
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I can't do this in one sentence... I don't know about others who self type IEI so will only speak for myself. I like to focus more on magic, metaphysical, ethereal, intangible and sometimes technological ideas than mundane matters but what I think is mundane may be highly fascinating to others and vice versa.
Relationships tend to sort themselves out and I often see exactly how things will play out. I find them interesting in relation to some kind of larger cosmic plan and intensity of connections, which I frequently mention to some people. Not everyone assumes I am loopy because of this. I am fully aware and competent in areas I do not enjoy discussing.
Edit: I do wonder about those LSE who do not speak English though.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I only speak when I forget how to shut up.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
i speak and words come out.