Yeah. Otoh, I actually don't always know where Ti ends and Se starts, in my own case. E.g. You can just move or you can move with precision, there's a difference.Or another example, you can go navigate around by just direct sensory input or your brain can also process the Ti aspects and use them for navigation just as successfully. And it's still linked to body/motor stuff because you are also moving around.
Yeah. As for myself, I'm somewhere exactly on that axis. Though definitely closer to 8.Extraverts are generally more in tune with stimulus-seeking affect (contrasted with introversion, which is, in part, unrelatedness with the object, aka enneatype 5 in one interpretation....which can be seen in the 8/5 axis).
I talked about my instinctual version of Ti in this thread already. Of course Se too but I specifically mentioned that because Ti isn't usually seen that way, it's usually seen as more mental for some reason, praytell why though. Mine is quite action oriented a lot of the time but even when just making judgments, a lot of the time it's done in an instinctual way. Meaning I don't actually have that mental type of thinking going on in my head, just an empty mind. The mental version of Ti which I also have is linked to my line to enneagram 5, yep.Another option (which you might not be open to) is to investigate DarkAngelFireWolf69's energy type idea, albeit not the exact model necessarily. What if someone's personal energy is very instinctual, but the way they think on a higher level doesn't match the intuitive association one would make to that?
Make sense?
Yeah, well, these functions have too much stuff encapsulated in them. There's the cognitive information content itself and then there is the mindset it can be processed with. And I don't know what else.This is where I make distinctions like saying Ti is not rigid, people are rigid. Ti is just a way of making sense of things a certain way, and I don't think rigidity really describes information so much as the style of a person who constructs the information. DCNH N-Ti is indeed rigid, because that is a more trait-theoretic portrayal of Ti, aka, pedantic, rigid, exacting, etc.



Reply With Quote