-
@mu4 OK more concise version (but sadly not SUPER concise) .. now I can trim the actual content, this is just trimming the wording--
1) What do the energy elements describe as opposed to the information elements, and in particular, how does the so-called S/N/T/F paradigm still work to describe energy metabolism when originally it was created for describing information metabolism? What are the definitions of the 8 energy elements/how can we recognize them *preferably* with compare/contrast to how the IE are defined (e.g. energo Se describes X while IE Se describes Y -- they are intuitively both "Se" forms but ultimately getting at different things..)
2) Why does static/dynamic get replaced seemingly with I/E in terms of dividing the information model vs energomodel into two distinguished halves? Reference: as in this article, where LSI gets divided into TiSiFiNi and the rest http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...y-V-DarkAngelFireWolf69%29 Why do extraversion/introversion alternate in the information metabolism model A, but are put together in energomodel?
Why do process/result flip, i.e. for example, why does energomodel LSI seem to follow the result pattern, while the usual LSI does process?
3) Obvious question but important: in what ways do energomodel and model A interact, i.e. instead of being two separate types, how do they talk to each other? One specific there is, if the energy model "sits on top of" the vital block of model A, how does it interact with it? Does it interact with the mental part of model A at all?
4) Once and for all, what's the real relation between energomodel and DCNH? Related? Can you have IP as your dcnh subtype but a different energomodel type, e.g., be LII-H+energomodel SEE, just for kicks?
5) There is a mental and a vital in model A -- the latter corresponds more to energy perhaps (but not the "disturbance" of one's energy state, rather, maybe what is used to maintain stable energy states..). Does DarkAngelFireWolf69 still use this paradigm? If so, do 4/8 of the energomodel elements correspond to mental things, the way 4/8 of model A are not how one represents information?
6) Ideally one illustration of 2 very different types and what happens as a result of the communication/combo, again something like say, LII-IEI or LII-SEE, etc.
7) What is the relation between the Persona type description in Man as a System of Types and the Energy Type -- the same, as appears suggested? DarkAngelFireWolf69 appears to suggest most tests of type are more akin to measuring persona than ego type, in that article. Is this the case with the MBTI for example?
As an example, I've often noted that there seems to be a discrepancy between irrational types in the informational sense -- i.e. Jung's diagnosis of Nietzsche as an introverted intuitive over an introverted thinking type based on how we cannot understand the information he conveys in a purely logical format, due to the divergence from logic and foray into intuition --- and the irrational type in the more behavioral/lifestyle sense, where e.g. one speaks to lower rigidity, higher flexibility and adaptability, as more of a way of life.
Last edited by chemical; 02-26-2015 at 07:32 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules