Originally Posted by
Myst
Well that's the thing, I find there's unexplained logical jumps from model A to cog styles yet it seems to work in my case which doesn't say a whole lot sure, that's not what determined my typing. Also, I can't tell if I'm positivist or negativist in general, only that I'm static. I don't think cog styles are meant to cover everything about how people think, though. It's totally alright if you find it dubious. I reserve judgment myself too.
Don't know what holds socionics back from operationalizing things and make a falsifiable scientific theory out of it. It's true that to put the definitions into an operationalized form meaning you can concretely test them out in experiments, you will have to undertake a big task. But no, don't know why no one took it up yet. I hear Jack Oliver Aaron wants to do it?