Quote Originally Posted by SisOfNight View Post
So, it likely must be an Fe thing of needing that Ti honesty, especially for Fe Leading and Fe subtype people.
Noticed the same


Finally, I could see most women being more drawn to the guy who is not displaying too many emotions, regardless of specific Sociotype. Studies have shown women prefer men to have less expressive faces, whereas men prefer women to smile, when it comes to attraction. However, I could see those findings being tied to most women being Ethical types, preferring Logical ones who have weaker Feeling, and vice versa. In that context, I can relate to finding "brooding men" more attractive from a distance. Still, I am more prone to finding SEE or IEE more attractive than LII, for instance. Could be the Se seeking, or looking for an Ep temperament or Aggressor, etc etc. Also, I find the fact that SEE and IEE are "serious" opposed to "merry" (according to Reinin) makes the emotionality of the SEE or IEE less exaggerated, it is not as "in your face" as with ESE and EIE, whom I both find too gregarious. The "serious" quality can make an SEE or IEE be a little bit more serious in expression, especially when they are on their own, being "themselves" (Fi) and the Fe demonstrative is inactive.

All in all, I'd still prefer SEE over both LII or ILE.
How much is that in percentages, "most women", afaik in MBTI research 60% of women turned out to be F types. I'd hardly call that "most women" I don't know about Socionics statistics. Looked at your link too, lol, I don't fit the mould, I always preferred feminine guys. Also I do prefer guys to smile instead of being totally non-expressive.