intention v action
I think:
Type 1) there are types that focus more on a person's actions (rather than their intention for doing an action) and
Type 2) there are types that consider a person's intention behind the action (and not just the action itself).
So for example, Person A did something that hurt the feelings of Person B, but Person A did not have evil intentions, but actually had innocent intentions.
Which types are Type 1, and which types are Type 2?
Type 2: INFJ
INFP
Type 2: INTj
In additon Type 2 is more understanding and readily forgiving.
Type 1's are not so forgiving and are emotionally defensive, perhaps lashing out in some way. They need more time to forgive, and will see if the behavior persists.
Type 1: S
Type 2: N
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
I just focus on how the action made me feel. I guess this puts me in the first cathegory.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I agree.Originally Posted by FDG
Agree.
Type 1 (EST): Don't forgive unless there's some sort ofthat proves that person b can be trusted again. Don't rely on their emotions or person b's emotions.
Type 2 (INF): Ready to forgive by person a's emotions and own rollercoaster emotions.So for example, Person A did something that hurt the feelings of Person B, but Person A did not have evil intentions, but actually had innocent intentions.
INFP
Type 2: ISTp
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
my initial reaction was something like
1:2
T:F
I think there are different kind of intentions and actions... this is what makes your superego different than your duality... i think its a matter of introverting and extraverting things.
-Slava
What a great replacement for a nany
type 2. ENTj
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
Type 1.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Which is why you get stuck on the FACT/RESULT that someone is ...say... "poor" ... instead of looking to see what their intentions ARE or WERE???
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
How about
Type 1: Xe
Type 2: Xi
?
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
thats what I said...How about
Type 1: Xe
Type 2: Xi
?
I think there are different kind of intentions and actions... this is what makes your superego different than your duality... i think its a matter of introverting and extraverting things.
why cant we just call it... introvert and extravert, lol, why are we using type 1 type 2.
-Slava
What a great replacement for a nany
I dunno, I'm type 2 for whatever it's worth.
I'm 100% category 2. The action itself is usually almost irrelevant to me. I react very badly to actions but very strongly to intentions. If I can't see the intention behind the action I rarely react at all. More likely just go on as if the action wasn't even there. I think this is a pretty subconscious thing to me.
How is it even possible to seperate the two?
You are 1!
Type 1. 'Tis a curse, really. Type 2 people have a tendency to annoy me.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
delete.
IEIsubtype
Well by observing peoples actions I can judge their motivation and vice versa.
That's exactly what I was getting at.
delete.
IEI
Why would I not care about it? That would make me biased. Besides I think this plays a greater role then type in the way people approach these situations (Where they judge other peoples actions and motivation behind those actions)Yes, but even if some know the motivation, they may not care about it, only the resulting action.That's exactly what I was getting at.
Id say 1 but the actions of a person may not tell the whole story and there may be reasons that cause the person to react that way that I am unaware of. Sometimes we have to look beyong the behavior to get to the root of the problem or we find we are just reacting to symptoms. Yes people should be responsible for their actions, but mercy and reasonablness dictate we look a little deeper.
Topaz
The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the Mountain of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity. It will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is my one weakness.
yeah this is what I mean.Why would I not care about it? That would make me biased. Besides I think this plays a greater role then type in the way people approach these situations (Where they judge other peoples actions and motivation behind those actions)Yes, but even if some know the motivation, they may not care about it, only the resulting action.That's exactly what I was getting at.
Topaz
The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the Mountain of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity. It will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is my one weakness.
Arggg... can someone please fill me in on what this thread is about and why its not just introvert/extravert.... with primary function either internalized or externalized.
-Slava
What a great replacement for a nany
Why do you think it's dependent upon the primary function?
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
