For fuck's sake SOMEONE wrote something specific.
Thank you kind sir. I'll take note of your words as I continue my research.
All I saw was calm and diligent. Not much activity. That is still said about the IEI instead.
Please explain.
Yes?
Explain this especially.
No, this is a common misconception. Te second function is not about potentcy, but about focus and prefference.
It's not your second function because you'll less able to use it, but because you'll be more likely to use Ni to generate bottom line principles and insights before using Te to collect data and back up your shit.
Te can be just as strong in INTJ and ENTJ.
Same thing is noted in MBTI, only more indirectly and more imprecisely.
I do relate to a lot of EII description as well as IEI, but the functions (as well as Reinin dychotomies) make it, or break it for me, because I see them both as the only stable part in a bunch of generalizations, both MBTI and Socionics-wise. (Even if the function descriptions are different, I still know I'm a socionics Ni dominant, Fe creative, just like I use NiFe as MBTI INFJ.)
This is not the issue with socionics, but MBTI it seems. MBTI is so watered down and messed with, descriptions are being ruined and we end up with improper behavior-function relations, so function based typing (MBTI) is a huge gap away from a very specific description based typing, with function definition, alone in and of itself, taking second place (socionics).