is shown when things like this are taken too seriously. Logical positivism seems to have been the version which rose to dominance in philosophy while empiricism (particularly as seen in the late 19th century) was the movement in the natural sciences. Has anyone else noted other examples?


Reply With Quote
like extj or both those types and the ixtps as possibilities? and what made you think that?
recognizes that overcomplicating the definitions does not solve the original problem that was meant to be addressed but rather worsens it. Foolish
>
in a manner prevalent around here, having no
in PoRL, and what he mentions about his ISTpishness is more likely for ESTp. I have only those three, and think it's enough, but he never agreed and at least put that nice ignore option on me. I at least wanted him to stop acting so determinately as if he's the perfect model of being ISTp as not so mislead people, but he took it just insult.

?) Or do we go for something that we know is fundamentally flawed? (