I think the Ignoring function is the "devil is in the details", or sometimes the "90% perspiration" function. I find that types minimize their contrary attitudes solely when they boast it, not as a state. Basically people are very strong in their Ignoring function and *could* do everything based on it "at any time", just they *don't* do it in order to produce value over it. They think it's too easy and foolish, because it is unvalued - they minimize its importance. For instance, Ti-Base types are interested in the correct reasoning, rather than correct premises; they think there is a lot of work in setting in place the system, while applying it is a mere formality. The vice-verse is valid.
I think this rule applies to the full ID block, not just the Ignoring function. One may, however, insist on these functions when dealing people of blind and/or painful spots on them (e.i. Dual, Illusionary, Semi-Dual). It's sort of:
- most of the time: "we don't have time for this"
- when someone fails at or rejects them: "you have to not oppose / overlook this entirely".
what is the distinction between a "reasoning" and a "premise"?