Indeed, if they were solely or even usually visual, it would probably have to be called objective rather than subjective, and thus not Ni. Jung at one point (as I recall) said that intuition would often be described as a sixth sense or a feeling (not emotional).Originally Posted by Kristiina
I think that the flash of insight might be more likely to happen if you're engaging a rational function to do something, and the Ni suddenly interupts to say “here it is..”.
I agree with that list, and in many ways it's much more what I meant on the IQ test part (which by this time I will say is a definitely bad example). However, none of these are intrinsically connected to time so much as sequence. I agree that “pattern recognition with objects that have physical shapes and size and location” has a lot to do with Se (and when I tried a few while looking for the linked image, I also found myself using a lot of Te to solve it – more than would be necessary if it were so much a part of Ni).Originally Posted by StevENTj
Score one more for that list...Originally Posted by FDG
Of course – functions rarely exist in a vacuum. However, you'll notice this is what I described above, in a manner: The Ni perception of some sequence of events is handed off to a rational function for evaluation.Originally Posted by Jonathan
Hmm, I believe you may be very useful to this thread to throw things into a Ni-producing perspective (since I'm pretty sure that whether I'm aware of it or not, I'll be speaking mostly from an Ni-accepting perspective).Originally Posted by StevENTj
Yes, that's a large part of what I meant...Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
...and I should note that I used “pattern” as a way of getting rid of the inherent time dependancy in title, but I think “development” fits much better.Originally Posted by gilligan87
By now, I think intuition of patterns is too broad a term to put as a function – we've already shown physical/spatial patterns may be Se, and developmental patterns is probably Ni.Originally Posted by Baby
“ABSOLUTE OPPOSITE” of a perception of physical time” - ie, subjective rather than objective, which is what an Xi should be. I like your way of putting that, but again, while this SUBJECTIVE inuition of time undoubtedly is very much a part of Ni, it would seem that Ni does not exclusively deal with this subjective time (ie, intuition of subjective time is a subset of Ni, but Ni =/= intuition of subjective time).
So, StevENTj's plus Baby's descriptions to keep in mind..Originally Posted by maizemedley
Very much what I meant in the wonderful visuals of snegledmaca. Since I first wrote this topic, I've been thinking that “intuition of connections” might be (part of) Ni, but so far it has seemed like that might be too broad (eg, relations [connections] between people). However, if we look at the posts here, you may observe that pretty much everything here is put in one form of connection or another. Here, we perceive the connection or sequence of connection between to points. “Intuition of development” would have to deal with the connections as something progresses – how this connects to this, then connects to this. Etc.. The first thing to notice is that these are subjective connections – as befits an Xi function – that they are perceptions – and thus irrational – and that they are mentally perceived – thus intuitions (come to think of it, there could be a wee bit of accepting bias to this. Comments, StevENTj?).Originally Posted by snegledmaca
Again, well put.Originally Posted by snegledmaca
Would you mind elaborating on these last two parts? I'm not sure that I understand your meaning correctly.Originally Posted by snegledmaca
Until I learn more about Jung's theory of archetypes, I'm going to be wary of using them for descriptive purposes of functions. I do agree that the intuitions tend to exist before becoming conscious that they exist, and have even seen scientific support of this, however.Originally Posted by Baby
..And here we come again to Ni not necessarily having to do with time, and being sequential.
“Fluid intution” - I like this one as well, and it fits well with the other definitions come up with here, as well.Originally Posted by Dynamicism
---------------------------------------
So, What we have thus far (as I see it):
Ni is the subjective mental perception of sequences. A fluid intuition, easily aware of how a sequence may develop.
Time is not an essential element of the sequence - however, it is a variable that in practice is so often present as to make it an essential element of Ni. But this is a subjective sense of time: not the ticking of the clock, but a sense of "when" more in the form of beats - a person with strong Ni may not be able to tell you how many seconds, minutes or hours something may take, but they can still indicate when it will most likely happen, before it does (eg, tapping their hand as they wait for person to walk to them, 'knowing' that the person is going to start talking to them about when they hit the fifth tap). It is also a sense of order - this before this, but after that - and connection - this to that to those.
-----------------------------------------
As a note, I've been thinking that Ni might be more along the lines of lineal intuition, and Ne more parallel intuition. I also think it might be possible that the other Xi/Xe splits might exhibit a similar dichotomy. One might see Ne as being most able to perceive an exploded diagram of a car engine mentally, while Ne would be most able to perceive the flow of it's workings.