I have noticed that I get annoyed when SLE is using Ti - when he explain something his thinking is too simplistic and too slow, as if he thought I'm idiot. On the other hand I admire him when he (and not only he) uses his demonstrative Te giving pure fact (for example historical dates). Is it normal? I thought that due to ignoring Te and base Ti my impression should be reversed. What do you think?
I'm not sure if this is correct forum, if not please move this thread


Reply With Quote

involving lots of kinky approximations
].
) For the LII, however, the simple models that illustrate reality based on information may seem like the SLE is talking to a child, as LII's strong Ti will not need the very slow and meticulous explanations. SLEs will probably see the weak Se of LIIs, though, and mistake it for a need to be explained reality through Ti, but LIIs don't necessarily need that. LIIs will access Se through their dual - the ESE - so through Fe, rather than Ti. 