I feel as though nature is a better architect than we are. Even though it moves slow, it moves much more stable and precise as nature has a far more intimate connection with it's masterpiece than we probably ever will. . The thing is though, we can't sit back and really do nothing, we'd also die off eventually(we are going to die off eventually anyways regardless of what we do) and be replaced by something else in the food chain. So agriculture was born, society rose up as a need to keep us all alive, keep us all fed etc. Many more changes will happen in the future, such as transhumanism. Now here's the problem. We aren't near as smart as we think we are. Scientific dogma runs high, it's ironically more dogmatic than religion in some ways. We assume that we know the answers to things, when really all we've done is observe an aspect of something which presents itself as that solution. Take something like evolution; before the last 5-10 years, scientists would have called you completely insane to suggest anything other as natural selection as being a protocol of adaptation. They will probably still call you crazy. New research has shown though that there are some invalid aspects to it, as it's being shown that epigenetic tags play a large role in what we give to our offspring. It'll probably require 50 years of proof before that would even be accepted. That's the problem with humans though, we always assume we know things.. we go forward on those assumptions.. and then we watch the unintended consequences unfold. When it comes to transhumanism , we can easily cause our own extinction or remove everything about us that makes us human... or something in those lines.... and not even realize that those consequences were primed to unfold because we didn't see all the aspects of it before hand. So while I think as a society we need to at times move forward, I feel like we also need to move backwards at times as well.