These arguments where lack of imagination is substituted for wisdom are annoying
Hmm, I'm not sure if immortality is technically possible. You could live to the end of the age of the universe. In the end, death still reaches you.
Maybe you could explore all possible worlds and live to the beginnings and ends of infinite universes. I think even then, still, you will thirst for more, be it experience, knowledge, or something else. You may even chase after the experience of death after a long enough time.
But really, you will die just like everyone else, knowing that there was much more to experience than you had.
my guru said i can do sadana to see i was never born and will never die
Immortality sees death everywhere. You are doomed to feel an eternal grief. If you can have children, you'll be the witness of the perpetual agony of your own lineage and the people you love. I think one can not survive immortality especially if one is the only one. Anyway, even if we as a species could survive the next mass extinction, and even if we could escape the solar system apocalypse, there will come a time where nothing of which has ever been on this earth will remain, not even the memory that it has ever existed. Unless we find a way to travel through the multiverse....
Time is just a metric unit for causality, which is in turn one of the principles through which consciousness orders the noumena into an understandable phenomena (like space, form...) The current "material" world is just one of the potential configurations of phenomena that consciousness can create in order to interact with it, including non-existence. The past does not exist and memory is just your imagination of a causality.
Reality is probably more like a big painting than like a clockwork.
I see no evidence this is true. Entropy only applies to closed systems, but the universe itself appears to be an open system.
By the nature of simply existing you are forced to. Eternal life or eternal death, you can understand these and we seem to live in an eternalist universe by virtue of 1. determinism being necessary for all our science 2. the universe appearing to be an open system not subject to the laws of entropy. There are no other options besides to make one infinite choice or another.
I don't think it's even possible to replace brain tissue with electronic circuitry and have it still be functional. The brain and the circuitry would probably electromagnetically interfere with each other in irreconcilable ways, producing pure noise and just reducing overall function.
It's fully possible to get an infinite number of states from an initial finite set of objects, if you assume that's what this universe is (a fair assumption.) Look into set theory.
I doubt the Illuminati will be able to do this with anything resembling ordinary technology. I also doubt they will be able to do this at all, but I think they are trying to do this in a way that doesn't use what's recognizable as ordinary technology. I do think humans would be biologically immortal simply in their natural state, though, free from all the poisons, and that would undo all the worst parts of aging to make plastic surgery not necessary. I don't want any part in what people like Aubrey de Grey are pushing, because I think they completely misunderstand things. I think living forever is not only desirable, it is the only option. However, I think all the transhumanist types misunderstand what it should mean and what humanity is. I think there is probably some sort of satanic agenda behind transhumanism, honestly. I support cybernetics, AI, etc. just not the ideology that usually goes with it. Why do they think technology will make them other than human, and why do they think that's a good thing?
Additionally, the "Singularity" sounds like a fake god and I am completely wary of that despite thinking AI is a good idea. I have a different conception of how I think AI should work based on what I think intelligence is. I don't think AI necessarily has to be conscious to be intelligent, and I think most people have trouble visualizing how that would really work. Even if some AI is conscious, that doesn't mean it has to be anything like the "Singularity," which I don't think is even possible the way they want it. The "Singularity" just sounds like the old myth of wanting a demon, faerie, djinn, etc. to solve all your problems. As we all know, that tends to go wrong. The wishes are always taken really literally, which sounds uncannily like something a malfunctioning computer that only uses its very literalistic programing code would do.
That being said, I think there is no other option besides immortality. We as humans are consciously aware of the idea of an infinite amount of time, and the only options are eternal life, and eternal death, which sounds like a form of torment, though eternal physical life could probably also be turned to the purpose of torment. However, eternal physical life in some form or another is a necessary precondition I think for beings who can understand infinity to achieve happiness, which makes it puzzling that we don't apparently get it. Either there is no supernatural or religious realm and there should be no obstacles to my eternal existence, in which case the state of the world is quite baffling with all the people who do not seem to realize their conundrum at all and are not doing anything about it despite the supposed complete lack of obstacles, or there is one and the eternal life is hidden, which makes things make more sense metanarratively but is also extremely unnerving. In the latter case, the main issue is really the active obstruction by hidden forces, not that the eternal life in that narrative must be something scientifically inexplicable rather than say maybe God gives humans technology to live forever. That is what there appears to be. Something appears to be obstructing the attempts at eternal life for humans despite the fact it is logically necessary for humans to enjoy happiness, and the agenda looks kind of satanic without any particular conspiracizing, though some people worshipping satanic entities does not itself have too many metanarrative implications for reality, we all know some people really do those things including many famous and powerful people.
I do not wish to be around when I'm a hypothetical fuming pile of ashes. So if can not have the suicide option (suffering due to the end of times) I pick only few thousand years.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org