It's whining and disengenous to incessantly request evidence knowing full well it doesn't exist and might only exist in the future.
I'm not trying to spritz it with lavender. I will say to anyone that socionics lacks evidence.
However it's disingenuous to keep asking for evidence when others have said that decent evidence doesn't exist.
1. Ask for evidence
2. Told it doesn't exist and will exist perhaps in the future
3. Ask for evidence again and again even after being told that it doesn't exist yet.
Is this not simply the act of a lunatic or a fraud? The answer to the first question has been conclusively given, yet over and over again the question is asked as if the answer has never been given. Such actions are without merit and character. It's simply disingenuous and dishonest.