You're ignorant. I don't really want to comment on the literature of Model A because in many ways that's unimportant and I've never care about Model A as a end point of all theoretical discussions. However Process/Result is a fundamental part of socionics, even more fundamental than Model A.
Process/Result is imo far more fundamental than Model A, I don't really think you understand what process/result means in information processing in socionics.
Process type information transformation(using just extroverted nomenclature as these related to energy processes) is
->
->
->
- >
Result type information transformation is
->
- >
->
->
This is because information metabolism process information like thermodynamic process process energy and is a reversible process.
The Ring of Social Progress exist because information is being processed to a purified form in the creative function and handed off in a uni-directional way to either the beneficiary or supervisor.
This is fundamental architectural features of Socionics, based on far more important axioms of Socionics.
The funny thing is 3rd order dichotomies Positivist/Negativist, Process/Result, Merry/Serious, Judicious and Decisive are far more important architecturally than 1st order Jungian dichotomies.
This is because Jungian dichotomies are empirical and behavioral observations which are much more readily apparent.
However, the underlying essense of socionics is how information is processed, what information is prefered.
Merry/Serious is the
/
divide, Judicious/Decisive the
/
divide. Process/Result, the direction of information flow. Gulenko called this evolutionary/involutionary, and for very good reason. Positivist/Negativist isn't something I've investigated fully but as a third order dichotmy
, it's likely very important.
Get off your high horse and realize you actually don't have a great understanding of this topic and are in zero place to decide what is canon or not canon. You're just a kid who has a lot to learn.