I do find some issues with LSI typing - Se's strength in my real life, as I don't mobilize others at all yet maintain high personal will; dichotomies that don't add up to it, as negativist alone would exclude LSI; cognitive style, as I relate to HP more than CD when I sit and consider how I've thought in the past; etc. I relate far more to some overall descriptions and quadra values as well - Golihov's LII is closer to me than his LSI and Beta's typically named values don't line up with my preferences.
I also don't look externally to others for great cause or meaning as I've seen in LSI'sdescriptions - always internally. You'll notice my interactions with some in the shoutbox hold a system or others up to an ideal that isn't shared by them. But the Ji aspect of what you described seems like something I can agree on. This is the consistency and rigidity of that idealistic tendency, I think.
As you said, you're going based off of the info you have, and that's perfectly fine. Things you've said here and private are something I can integrate into my own model.
It's entirely possible that neither type is correct for me, haha.



descriptions - always internally. You'll notice my interactions with some in the shoutbox hold a system or others up to an ideal that isn't shared by them. But the Ji aspect of what you described seems like something I can agree on. This is the consistency and rigidity of that idealistic tendency, I think.
