Results 1 to 40 of 2881

Thread: Your typing of forum members (archived '15-'17)

Threaded View

  1. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Verbrannte View Post
    @Myst, well, both EIE and ILI are Obstinate and Negativist so I thought you might have seen that. They have the same of DarkAngelFireWolf69's cognitive styles if you use that too. So, would you please tell me what your reasoning is then? I'm surprised I'm not ubiquitously considered LIE somehow, since everyone is like "you're the most logical person" (pfft no) and then other stuff.
    I really don't use Reinin, most of the dichotomies are only theoretically sound and cannot be observed in concrete behaviour or in communication. As for cog styles, I like them but I don't believe these can easily be determined from the outside either.

    I don't see you as Te base, you seem to be into a mode of analytical thinking more than LIEs. I also don't see creative manipulation of Fe from you so IEI is out as well.


    Yeah, people want to type like half or more of the women IEI or SEI and the men ILI or SLI from what I've seen. It's sort of absurd. Ep is fairly common as well, Ij less, and Ej the least (except the individual type EII, which people are reluctant to hand out for a combination of "it's a special snowflake Homo superior" and "Maritsa says no" reasons despite being basically exactly as common as any other type. The existence of EII is the only reason Ep seems to be more common than Ij, since besides that people have a strong tendency to assume everyone is introverted, but since 1/4 of the Ij types are off limits that tips it over).
    The SEI/SLI typings do seem absurd, most Si bases don't seem to go deep in this stuff.

    I totally agree with your thoughts on EII.


    Quote Originally Posted by Hacim View Post
    You have more similarities with your mirror than the "average" LSI. C subtypes can be mistaken for their mirrors without careful observation.
    I can't relate to C description though. They seem too individualistic. I am in a sense but I care too much about involvement overall. I can't relate to this creative idea generating thingy either. I relate to being set on a goal and organizing things for that though and that's where I relate to D. And that is SLE-ish, sure, since D subtype has accentuated Se too, not just C subtype. At the same time my Ne is practically nonexistent so D again makes more sense than C. Se/Te/Fe are definitely all more emphasized for me than Ne. I could go on...

    I get it that the point of DCNH is to differentiate within type though, so these descriptions are relative... unfortunately I haven't been in a group of LSIs IRL yet but got a bit of experience online, at the ISTJ subforum on PerC. And they wanted to type me ESTJ because I'm more "brash" than most of them, apparently. The people saying that mostly seemed N and H...
    Last edited by Myst; 10-20-2016 at 11:35 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •