Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
Again Ti PoLR-ish
Apparently, you're the 1D Ti.

You first endorse the theory in all its entirety then you forget about all of it when you claim that the Typer cannot absolutely know a thing.
You under the impression that one cannot see viewpoints without choosing to adhere to them? Of course the typer cannot absolutely know a thing; that's why it's a theory of the mind. You're attesting that a theory of the mind can be proven, when the definition of such is that it cannot.

Lol, I never made such a claim. Lol. Reread.
Yes, you did.

Science of psychology lacks good enough tools and understanding too.

Yes, there are notions in academic psychology that do talk about the same as certain socionics ideas.

There is however some tenets in the socionics model (and in Jung's) that I've never seen anywhere else while they also seem to have some validity.

That doesn't make the socionics model perfect. Far from it. I'm not exactly accepting of all parts of it "as is".

Lastly, I don't exactly use socionics as my only tool or even a primary tool for social interactions, lol..
Try biology. Psychology is still a theory of the mind itself. You spoke of information processing of the brain. That's biology.