Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
But time exists. As you attempt to gather data, more is created.
That's not exactly a problem on its own.


Jeremy: Just like first questionnaire compared to second, time exists, and he exists outside of the time you see him. If he's with you everyday for 4 hours, and displays Norms of Fi the whole time and none for Ne, how do you know that he doesn't display Ne Norms and no Fi Norms for the remaining 12 waking hours of the day?
Typer: Well, a highly qualified Typer can...
Jeremy: Time still exists for Bill outside your own relationship with him.
Typer: Well, sure, he COULD be different technically, yes, but it is highly unlikely.
Jeremy: How is it "highly unlikely" if you just straight up have absolutely no idea?
Lol. Do you wanna be Ti PoLR, now?

Why on earth would Typer have "absolutely no idea". That's not exactly true. There is more consistency than that in this world. Simple as that.

There is only one way it would be true - if the situations are distributed carefully in a way that when Bill spends time with Typer it's only situations where Bill uses the -say- learned Fi norms but is otherwise an SLE. But just how likely is it that Bill is going to carefully pick such situations only. He doesn't even have the means to do so.

If we had more precise objective tools to investigate the brain and better understanding of it in general then this wouldn't be an issue. Obviously I am going beyond socionics here and talking about information processing of the brain in general.