never mind that you are utterly wrong. one thing that you *can* do is toss every rational type out of consideration for me. my type changing is probably also not what you think. what's changing isn't my self-perception so much as how i'm applying socionics, although i do like to be changeable. even if i was certain on my self-typing i might change my type a lot under my avatar anyway. you are too wed to surface appearances and your categorizations of them.
that said, i still think your ability to actually make these arguments in the concrete way you do is really valuable. perhaps you cannot have one without the other easily.
after reading this description though i don't think you really understand how i operate. i'm also still kind of floored that you can switch someone from ILI to ESE (re: chipsandunderwear) so flippantly while at the same time being all "SEI and ILI are totally different." no kidding. the contradiction is fully acknowledged in my mind. but ESE and ILI are even more different.
i have long known what i am probably not. serious typings for me were ILI, IEI, and then after years and reinterpreting the IEs a bit, i began to question my initial ideas and that's how the rest of this mess entered the picture. i can't really consider beta or delta seriously for myself anymore. i don't have enough interactions with people irl who i see as alpha or gamma to get a feel for those intertype relations.
also, i don't remember suz even being on your ese list when i made my comment... i remember looking for her and not finding her.
you just don't understand what is beneath things. it kind of makes me want to bash you over the head. (not literally exactly. i am posing as the enemy, i'm not really your enemy.)



