Quote Originally Posted by xerx View Post
Thank you for this irrelevant digression and oh so prescient arm chair psychoanalytic breakdown of my motivations. I'll be sure to consult you the next time I need to see a therapist and I'm running on a short budget.




But that's the point: nobody's giving a reference frame when they make these gigantic lists. There is no hint of where the typings came from or the framework used to generate them. The only constant I see is people copying other people's typings with some modifications of their own.

If I, xerx, had written this:

Allie: SLE or LSI
Ashton: SLE
discoJoe: LSI
jessica129: SLE or LSI
Reuben: EIE
Rick: IEE
silverchris9: IEI
Trevor: LII
woofl: SEE
Yaaroslav: >_<
...

Those are my genuine impressions of these people's types. Do my unsubstantiated claims add any level of enlightenment to the discussion or just more noise -- or, for that matter, more fodder for drama?

Addendum: I've engaged in this sort of activity before as well, so I'm not excusing myself in any way; it was just as idiotic when I was doing it.

Ok, dude, whatever. Don't some people's types just seem totally obvious and undebatable to you? It's a bit far-fetched to expect everyone to type C-pig or Aylen something different. I'm gonna agree with Socionics theory here and conclude justifying everyone's types in one paragraph by you could work as foreplay for a SEI before lunch.