I got my self type on it and it was very easy to choose between the options presented. Some tests are too ambiguous. Thanks for not going with sliders. I never know where to set them so I tend toward the middle.Originally Posted by Reficulris
I can see you were going for a professional look. I can't remember if you were into marketing or not but I vaguely remember something associated with it and psychology. I like your site.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
It is also not working...at least on Mozilla it isn't. As I mentioned earlier.
There's just so much wrong with this picture:@Contra EII-Fi?
That is the best you could come up with for him?
Seriously? Are we being punk'd?
He types us identicals Contra but I would expect no less from someone who has no clue what Ni is.
Visualize this:
-> Why are there working gloves on the desk...? I have a hunch I know, I'll be back to this.
-> He is not actually looking at the monitor
-> Where do you get electricity from in a freshely decorated room(it ties up with point one)
-> Why would anyone fix walls, paint etc in those clothes and then sit behind an ancient PC?
-> Is it just a worker who tried to be funny? The clues are obvious...half unpainted walls, the mop below the monitor, working gloves, obviously empty frame etc.
...YES! E pur si muove! ...or not, it is, you know, a picture.
Pointless, but still an observation.
The gloves are just there in preparance for the punishment the Moderator will give for being oh so naughty.~ He knows the moderator only likes it with gloves on.
Also I nominate myself for a free typing.
Hi, Sorry I didn't notice you mentioning that.
I tested it in Firefox just now and it seemed to work. What exactly happens for you when you open the page?
Thanks! <3I got my self type on it and it was very easy to choose between the options presented. Some tests are too ambiguous. Thanks for not going with sliders. I never know where to set them so I tend toward the middle.
I think sliders introduce problems because socionics has such a strong binary focus (dichotomies are not scales in my opinion). I noticed that the test seems to perform better the more socionics knowledge the taker has, which is a problem since the site is mostly aimed at true beginners. So much work so little time
The underlying idea of it is indeed to get to a point where i can use it for marketing/targeting purposes, as it is now it's far from optimal yet.
I'll list them, ok?
1. The "Free personality test(short)" title is missing unless highlighted.
2. There are some errors in JavaScript, it seems. A syntax error and three reference errors({wpvq_is_debug is undefined}x2 and wpvq_refresh_page is undefined)
3. There are two security warnings: "Loading mixed (unsafe) content displayed on a secure page "http://personalityfound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/personality-found-find-who-you-are.png"x2 "
4. Here's a link to the #3 problem: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/.../Mixed_content
5. Hence I don't see the test(maybe AdBlock Plus isblocking it lol?)
Just fyi.
Thanks for the analysis! Going to see what causes this.
Hmm the security error is probably because I use a third person plugin for the quizz itself. Didn't think about it but that fucks up the https... mmm
You're quite welcome.
I suspect Director Abbie is ESTJ, indeed
Can it be you are doing this WITHOUT anything physical?
Darn, the things to transpire!
It's possible to suspect types by seeing how people talk and other behavior. Also I saw her photo.
Ah, I knew it. I knew I was missing yet that crucial piece of data.
Aylen - INFP, based on forum's blablabla and video
"I believe everything and I believe nothing. I suspect everyone and I suspect no one."
Bite me!
To be clear, he did type me "IEI", and not "INFP", in his response. I don't want confusion with MBTI since he and I are not on the same page with MBTI correlations.
Thanks sol. I appreciate the vote of confidence that I am indeed your conflictor.
Edit: Unfortunately now that I have interacted with you in this way, I am now torn. Plus you recently made some typings I actually agree with. Wonders will never cease to amaze! How can I continue to poke at you, when you annoy me, now that I have deemed you, "not so bad, after all"? I have a dilemma but I am sure you will make it easy again at some point.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yes, as some people read bad sources.
"INFP" means 4 words: Jung's introversion, intuition, feeling, irrationality/perceiving (their descriptions are identical in MBT and Socionics sources and Jung used both terms for same). MBTI will give you INFP with more probability than any other type. If you agree that you have the mentioned dichotomies, then you agree with the used MBT notation for IEI.MBT uses Jung's dichotomies as primary way to identify types, so their mistaken functional model changes nothing.
As I never noticed that you poked me, so there is no difference will you do same or other. I suppose, you need to find your dual as better object for poking and common betish s&m.How can I continue to poke at you, when you annoy me, now that I have deemed you, "not so bad, after all"? I have a dilemma but I am sure you will make it easy again at some point.
Seems you noticed a couple of times but if you didn't I will start translating to Russian. I have enough dual sources to poke at.
I am not into S&M though. Too restricting. Perhaps you might enjoy being the M in it. I heard some LSE enjoy giving up some control, in certain situations.
For an IEI, I think the best nemesis is an SLE. It is poetic really. I guess you don't notice since you could never be my nemesis.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Only took him a while
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
That's just Maritsa being Maritsa. You're an ESE.
IEE Ne Creative Type
Someand role lovin too. (
) I
too...
I don't think so.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She's bubbly when happy and she is sometimes happy for no reason at all. That is in essence a Merry ESE, not a Serious IEE.
IEE Ne Creative Type
Some
And how exactly are you serious?
I've watched @Suz in interaction for a while now and I don't see Fe. She's all Fi, giving hearts, love, patience in difficulties of others.
Fe* – Expression of mood and emotions. How to get people to the right emotional response; How to change somebody’s mood when you need to. How to make them feel what you feel?
You are a very emotional person. You know how to convey your mood; how to create a social atmosphere; how to coerce, persuade, influence, transform, subdue, endear, or entice.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
sigh... i give up.
As much as I like Maritsa, I think she does have a tendency to "confirm and final" typings when they shouldn't be. She "confirmed and finaled" me as SEE a couple years ago. Now she is "confirming and finaling" me as IEE. So, which is it? Can I really rely on her socionic impressions of me?
It's actually not so important to me anymore to be properly typed, as I'm not planning to use socionics to pick out dating partners or friends. The dynamic determines compatibility, and it will work out if it's meant to.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Do I seem like a bubbly and full of merriment person to you?
IEE Ne Creative Type
Some
Yes?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Definitely a lot more than the average joe. Nevertheless, I dont doubt your IEEness. And agreed that Suz is most likely ESE.
Trust me, I was being serious and not merry the entire time. I occasionally laugh at something funny I read or hear on the radio or a funny thought. Otherwise I'm a very serious person.Yes?
Thanks darya, I always thought you were an IEI, why the switch to EIE? Oh, hahah I get it.
IEE Ne Creative Type
Some
I trust @Animal typing because he met you in person. I wonder how he compares you to @applejacks and @adriYes?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That would be a tell!
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
I wrote my thoughts on Suz's type after our 2014 meeting here. I believe her to be ESE.
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
uuuuuuh-huuuuuuuuuuuh
j/k
you seem like a jokey guy to me tho
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Yeah i too am curious how my demeanor compares to AJ's in particular. I dont think i've ever interacted with adri, but sure compare me to her too
April's met me a few times too, and she's good at socionics, so her opinion should count too
p.s. this is purely for scientific purposes... Iu all no matter the type
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I think @Maritsa might have some solid grounds for typing @Suz IEE. I myself was wondering if whether or the not the sort of bubbliness and merriment we see in people like Suz is really an Fe ego trait like a lot people here think. Spreading hearts to everyone in the manner she does always seemed more like an irrational trait to me. I think a lot of people forget that Fe is a judgement function and that rationals come across in a much more heavy, serious manner then irrationals. Fe uses emotions in a calculated manner, often to push people towards some universal cause. The Fe ego always has some agenda behind behaving the way they do, while Suz acts nice and bubbly just for the sake of it, which might be her using Fe in a demonstrative manner.
I don't see you using Fe as a base function. My ESE sister and other Fe types here don't go around loving on people. That is a NeFi thing.Yeah i too am curious how my demeanor compares to AJ's in particular. I dont think i've ever interacted with adri, but sure compare me to her too
April's met me a few times too, and she's good at socionics, so her opinion should count too
p.s. this is purely for scientific purposes... I
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What I don't get is where is Ne as a base function in Suz? Bubbliness/seriousness has nothing to do with differentiating between ESE or IEE imo, they can both be either or. My opinion: If Suz is 9w1, then she can't be ESE. While reading the chatbox and about her love life, she seems more ESE 2w3 to me (being quite demanding and proud) , but then there are so many conflicting informations (her relating to very passive IEI profile description for example) , it's difficult to tell.
Posting Permissions
