About the timing thing: see my post about complex systems here: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...=1#post1529431Originally Posted by godslave
If such a thing was predictable, I don't think the climate could be considered a complex system and there would be a consensus on not only global warming, but on whether (no bad pun, now!) or not it will rain in two months here or there.
Climate science is very straightforward and enjoyable to learn. This is a good primer about climate change IMO (if you've had some university physics / chemistry): https://www.e-education.psu.edu/meteo469/node/115
I don’t see why climate scientists would lie and I’m not confident enough in my intelligence to debunk their hypotheses or inclined to listen to random podcaster’s hot takes on the issue.
Last edited by Averroes; 08-30-2022 at 08:35 PM.
I should have said Anthropogenic global warming.
Without global warming the average temperature of the Earth would apparently be -18 degrees rather than about 15 degrees Celsius.
That’s without CO2 in the atmosphere. It’s the average temperature of an object in space which is 93 million miles from the sun. That includes spacecraft and the moon.
Climate scientists would lie because they all love Satan.
Wait. …. I might be posting in the wrong thread.
Yeah, climate scientists are the ones warming the planet to make it a better home for Satan.
#NewConspiracy #WakeUp #INeedSleep
you will eat crickets and be happy
That's not vegan.
Idc honestly
I'll care when it affect me directly
I do and it's directly effected my life and career. I have also profited off the warming caused acceleration of mountain beetle infestations in Canada and US.
However, I will never support enforced austerity, not carbon tax schemes, which were created by Oil companies to begin with.
These are just social engineered money grabs meant to pass the responsibility off to other people, while taxing the middle class and lower class the most and creating world poverty.
Reducing fertilizer is also another thing will create instability and world poverty. If the purpose is to protect the environment, then why does its effects net increase globalization? The food has to come from somewhere. No these schemes are about control.
I find young neo lib types the most moronic. Must be nice growing up in plentiful world with all the necessities. Easy to create and demand austerity when you've. never. Had. To. Live. That way.
I also find the aging out boomers equally as guilty as they express their guilt for this and try and destroy their children's chances at a wealthy life. It's nihilistic. Mortality is scary, I guess.
Plus, this idea that the entire worlds ecosystems will collapse and all will go extinct, including Civilization, is also moronic and Childish. Life has always been here and always will be in some form, u less we go nuclear.
I feel sorry for young people who lack agency.
What should end is over consumption and pollution. We can be cleaner and resuse our products.
But taxing carbon as social engineering is inhuman. Your efforts given away to "the establishment". Fuck, that, shit.
And no, it's the end consumer that pays the taxes, not the corporations.
Last edited by timber; 10-06-2022 at 07:24 PM.
You think because you sit there and eat tofu that you’re somehow changing the basic universal constants of the reality we exist within. You’re not changing sh*t. You’re a dork
Reply With Quote
