@Director Abbie, I'm open to suggestions - process of elimination sounds interesting

I have a question on this part:
My initial impression based on the second movie was LIE, but I don't see a reason he can't be SLI. He doesn't seem LSE...
LIE is Te-lead, so is LSE and SLI Te-creative - what makes you eliminate LSE, but assume LIE or SLI are plausible - what do they share in common that the LSE doesn't (I thought SLI would have more in common with LSE than with LIE?)