I realize what I've been doing wrong. From this thread:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ll=1#post68710

(Regardless of what I said above)

This is my Ti:

Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan
Then, there's another interpretation of . This interpretation of says that it's really just pure logic, pure understanding of systems, understanding the inner logic of an argument, the essence, the kind of thinking you do when you prove theorems or program computers or solve computer problems...the sort of inner organic logic you use in creating something new that has its own internal logic to it.
This is not:

Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan
When I think of people who fit LII via this description, these are people who have a "default" sense of being right....as if they can't be wrong. Trying to show that they might be wrong is like hitting a brick wall. Even if they're wrong about something, they have such a "sense" of being right that everybody believes them.