O_o I don't think you need any of that to do this test.
Hahahah. Well for Leading function it isn't just a tool, it gains its own agenda. This is a big point in this theory.I have had some sort fatigue for some time. It is hard to concentrate on things like this. On the other hand logic is just a tool. Admit it you LxIs!
It's ok to feel tired btw.
The statements usually have content that does still come from actual tangible reality, hopefully. My pov, anyway.Anyways basing logic purely on statements is just foolish because it blindfolds you (extroverted attitude?). The rational label? Don't know about that. I like to think irrationally by entertaining different possibilities and discover. On the other hand I have had some extensive education around this area.In this test they didn't come from there, lol.
I've actually done such programming.Purely rationally logical stuff happens only in logical circuits. If you speak hardware then you should become some kind of processor engineer or low level programmer (as in assembly and stuff). Ugh...
Leaving that up to you ILEs. Enjoy your speculations!You should assemble together predictions from incomplete data, take into account randomness. Physics is filled with examples how some simple abstractions becomes impossible to solve exactly and how lack of controlled initial conditions will make things truly chaotic.
I didn't explicitly learn any of this. Anyway, no, not claiming that anyone would be always 100% logical. That's just not how the human brain/mind works anyway. It has several systems working together beyond just logical evaluations.



Reply With Quote