Results 1 to 34 of 34

Thread: UDP and Maritsa on protection (split)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default UDP and Maritsa on protection (split)

    I wrote this an hour ago but my internets ran away, so, it's a little temporarily out of place...

    We can't get out of the situation in this case, because one side of us wants to contribute to knowledge and yet another wants to help; ESTj would either tell everyone to back off, or as you saw Rasputin told me to stop talking in not such a direct way. I have a need to convey information dispite the Se-polr and stubborness, drive, and consistancy don't help in this matter.
    @Maritsa

    I would defend you but I think you need to learn something here, Maritsa. You can't keep running away from problems or expecting someone to save you from something.

    A lot of people don't particularly think you are going about things very well, so you should consider why they feel that way - not just write off what they are doing as some sort of "Gang Se Tactic". I feel like you are using that as a cop out.

    Too much protection and rescuing makes someone less likely to take care of themselves ; this is the Moral Hazard.

     
    What an interestingly titled term for this situation

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,960
    Mentioned
    669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryu View Post
    I wrote this an hour ago but my internets ran away, so, it's a little temporarily out of place...


    @Maritsa

    I would defend you but I think you need to learn something here, Maritsa. You can't keep running away from problems or expecting someone to save you from something.

    A lot of people don't particularly think you are going about things very well, so you should consider why they feel that way - not just write off what they are doing as some sort of "Gang Se Tactic". I feel like you are using that as a cop out.

    Too much protection and rescuing makes someone less likely to take care of themselves ; this is the Moral Hazard.

     
    What an interestingly titled term for this situation
    I am doing this without you or your help...so go eat your COOKIES because that's what you are good for. I dislike you in very many ways one such way is that you don't know how to be you, provided that you are an LSE.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #3
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,960
    Mentioned
    669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sometimes, it's honorable for a man to "take care" of a woman or a situation where they have knowledge that the person can not defend themselves fully, or full to capacity. You are one twistedly weak LSE in that you can't realize when I am weak, you can't realize when the encroachment of others causes a pattern that further makes me weaker (even when I spell it out for you), thereby stepping in, and that you just have this selfish ideal of your LSE-ism and you can see me as a person, only as an obect on this forum.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  4. #4
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lobo View Post
    You remind of that little LSE kid video I posted some time ago. "Bacon is good for meh."
    oh yeah, that kid was awesome
     


    So much for deltas being objective when they're feeling angry, eh?



    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    I am doing this without you or your help...so go eat your COOKIES because that's what you are good for.
    I am good at eating cookies, true. Very good, actually.
    As a matter of fact, last week, I ate a full-sized box of them all by myself in about 3 days.

    I dislike you in very many ways one such way is that you don't know how to be you, provided that you are an LSE.
    I don't defend people just because they are EII. I'd advise you to not try to proclaim positive feelings about/towards someone just because they appear to be your socionics dual, either.

    Keep in mind, I am fully capable of giving you tough-love, which is what I was doing in the last post to you. I'm sure you are strong enough to handle things on your own.


    PS: ...
    Also, fwiw, I've done a fair job of getting EIIs upset with me

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •